The Star Wars sequence for kids

This is a long-standing ques­tion for Geek­dads of all kinds: 1) WHEN do you intro­duce your chil­dren to the Star Wars movies and 2) In what sequence should you show the films?

Dif­fer­ent gen­er­a­tions have gen­er­ally expe­ri­enced the films dif­fer­ently, often with dif­fer­ent judg­ments as to their value, as George Lucas explains in this interview:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon — Thurs 11p / 10c
George Lucas
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Polit­i­cal Humor Health Care Crisis

The dilem­mas may seem obvi­ous, but let me explain. There are two dom­i­nant schools of thought on the issue. In the first, you present the films in their strict pro­duc­tion order, i.e., the orig­i­nal tril­ogy first and pre­quels I-III later. (Since most par­ents who love the Star Wars films expe­ri­enced the films in this order, that’s the over­whelm­ing favorite.) 

The other, minor­ity view, says that you should present the films in their nar­ra­tive sequence, begin­ning with Episode I and con­tin­u­ing through to VI. This is often dis­re­garded out of hand, but there are sev­eral argu­ments for it:

  • This is the order of the story as Lucas con­ceived it, and which he’s gen­er­ally endorsed;
  • It’s eas­ier for a child to under­stand a story told from begin­ning to end, rather than one with an extended flashback;
  • The pre­quels, espe­cially the first two, are tar­geted for small chil­dren. Do you really want to wait until your son or daugh­ter ages out of the period where The Phan­tom Men­ace is totally awesome?

There’s a third posi­tion, which holds that the three pre­quels are apoc­ryphal per­ver­sions of the orig­i­nal tril­ogy and best kept away from chil­dren at all costs.

Let me make the case for an alter­nate sequence. Tell the story accord­ing to the age-appropriateness of the films. Essen­tially, you make the tril­ogy a big par­al­lel mon­tage, match­ing arche­types across dif­fer­ent times, gen­er­a­tions, and places — kind of like LOST.

On this the­ory, you begin with Star Wars IV: A New Hope. It’s the best stand-alone movie in the series, and if your kid isn’t into it, it’ll prob­a­bly take a while for them to be into the rest. 

Then, jump to I: The Phan­tom Men­ace. You can explain that this is the story of Luke’s father Anakin Sky­walker, Obi-Wan Kenobi, and C-Threepio. No spoil­ers necessary!

From here you can go to either II or V, depend­ing on your child’s rel­a­tive inter­est in either story, or which of the two DVDs you have ready at hand. You can even wait one-to-three years (as we who saw the films the­atri­cally had to) for your son or daugh­ter to age into them. 

Then you intro­duce them to the Indi­ana Jones movies, as is right and just.

Finally, you show them VI and III, ter­mi­nat­ing both trilo­gies simul­ta­ne­ously, show­ing how Luke and Anakin make dif­fer­ent choices, and how Anakin/Vader is finally redeemed.

You can work in the Clone Wars car­toons, the Lego Star Wars games, as well as the nov­els, ency­clo­pe­dias, etc., as appro­pri­ate, based on your child’s approx­i­mate level of interest.

Alter­na­tive solu­tion: you watch the movies as I’ve done with my son, hap­haz­ardly depend­ing on my mood, and let­ting them tag along (cov­er­ing their eyes as needed), trust­ing that they’ll sort it out for them­selves later. Easy, and has as much to rec­om­mend it as most other approaches.

25 Responses

    […] many Star Wars links lately? Tough. Snark­mar­ket tack­les the seri­ous ques­tion of what sequence you should use when intro­duc­ing your chil­dren to Star Wars. There’s a third posi­tion, which holds that the […]

    Jennifer says:

    Sorry, my kids are going to be on the Harry Pot­ter (books) — Hob­bit (book) — Harry Pot­ter (movies) — Hob­bie (movie) — LOTR (book hope­fully first but that’s a long way off) track. By the time we’re all done with that, they’ll be 30 and if they really want to watch Star Wars they can watch it in what­ever order they like. :)

    Nathan says:

    Or you can pre­tend that I-III never hap­pened, since they are truly awful movies, and ignore them alto­gether. I mean really…good luck get­ting your kids into The Phan­tom Men­ace. If there is any­thing kids love it’s trade dis­putes, treaty sign­ing, pol­i­tics and a story line that implodes in on itself like a dying star.

    Jonathan says:

    You said what I came here to say. I’d only add that ROT­Jedi is bor­der­line too-sucky-to-bear. And that the Clone Wars should be killed.

    Tim Carmody says:

    Jedi has flaws, but man, it has its moments, too. I don’t know if I’d want to live in a world with­out Han’s res­cue from Jabba the Hutt, Yoda’s death scene, the speeder chase on Endor, or Luke’s con­fronta­tion with Vader and the Emperor.

    Robin Sloan says:

    This is such a great piece of writ­ing! Reads like some­thing funny from the New Yorker (no really, some­thing actu­ally FUNNY from the New Yorker). “Then you intro­duce them to the Indi­ana Jones movies, as is right and just”—ha!

    David says:

    I’m caught between this gen­er­a­tional con­cern. Born after the the­atri­cal release of Return of the Jedi, I expe­ri­enced the orig­i­nal tril­ogy entirely on VHS. This meant rewind­ing and rewatch­ing my favorite parts, and fast-forwarding through bor­ing sequences (Cloud City).

    My galaxy far far away is a jum­ble of scenes in the same world, not a sequence of events. I can’t recall the first time I watched a Star Wars film, much less which one it was. I don’t remem­ber find­ing out Darth Vader was Luke’s father — that’s as basic a piece of infor­ma­tion as the color of the sky or my own name.

    I expect it will be the same for chil­dren of this gen­er­a­tion: an assort­ment of somewhat-related sit­u­a­tions, remem­bered more for their abil­ity to instill won­der than any­thing about their plot.

    I’m not even pos­i­tive I knew that Indi­ana Jones and Han Solo weren’t the same person.

    Justin says:

    You have just made me excited to have kids. I remem­ber in my view­ing of Star Wars, the first I saw was Empire Strikes Back, as it was show­ing on PBS for some rea­son. Which now seems like start­ing Bat­tlestar Galac­tica (2004) at sea­son 1 episode 1 instead of the minis­eries, which I did. But I think I could really get behind show­ing it I-VI, just to see how the story actu­ally flows. Seri­ously great post.

    Andrew says:

    That Darth Vader is Luke’s father feels like knowl­edge that seems an essen­tial part of my make up as well.

    My first con­crete mem­ory of watch­ing Star Was is: slid­ing the tape in the popped-up recep­ta­cle of the Beta­max machine, push­ing down on the big play lever, hear­ing the sat­is­fy­ing clunks of machin­ery and lis­ten­ing to the belts whir, my older brother read­ing me the open­ing crawl as the score thun­dered as best it could from our TVs tiny speakers.

    Cer­tainly not the first time I saw it, but my ear­li­est remem­bered viewing. 

    And as a lit­tle kid, the Star Wars Sto­ry­book, with accom­pa­ny­ing record, was an equally impor­tant part of my expe­ri­ence. Because of the nar­ra­tion of the book, for a year or two I was con­vinced that the name of Luke’s Home­world was “Tatooine Below.”

    Gavin says:

    I remem­ber see­ing the 1977 Star Wars repeat­edly at my grand­par­ents’ house (the part where Darth Vader chokes the rebel offi­cer used to freak me the hell out–loved the movie any­way, or because because of that.) I was just old enough to see Return of the Jedi in the­aters (pos­si­bly in sec­ond run, 1984 would be just about right). I was in my teens, how­ever before I saw Empire Strikes Back. So I knew about Darth lit­er­ally years before I saw the reveal, and prob­a­bly knew before I saw Jedi.

    My girls are just about that age now, and I think it’s high time for Episode IV. I see no rea­son to bring in the pre­quels if and until they’re requested. (This may be a chal­lenge, actu­ally. I own Episodes ! and II, and none of the others…)

    Gavin says:

    Look­ing back at the post, I don’t have any con­cerns about my 4 and 5-year-old daugh­ters’ abil­ity to under­stand flash­backs. They get things out of nar­ra­tive order all the time.

    Mark says:

    The opti­mal order that I have fig­ured out is IV-I-V-II-III-VI, treat­ing the orig­i­nal tril­ogy as the main story, and the pre­quels as extended flash­backs. The weak point is hav­ing to sit through two pre­quels in a row, but it is hoped that the momen­tum will have set in by that time and will engen­der a bit of patience in that regard. IV intro­duces the set­ting, while I deep­ens it a bit and expounds upon what Jedi are about. V’s big rev­e­la­tion is pre­served, and then you digress into II and III to see just how that came to pass. Those two set up the milder rev­e­la­tions of VI, which resolves the whole story very nicely.

    Saheli says:

    Your Geekdads ref­er­ence sud­denly made me real­ize some­thing I had never thought to ask in the 14 years that I have been baf­fled by peo­ples’ obses­sion with SW: is it a gen­der obses­sion? (Silly Saheli once again for­gets to cor­rect for the fact that her physics-based social cir­cle is over­whelm­ingly dom­i­nated by guy?) Because I am some­one who has *boxes* of books stacked away against the day I finally pro­duce or find a child/chlildren to raise, and this Star Wars dilemma has never once occurred to me. I’m with Jen­nifer. My real dilemma is whether or not to give them my untouched Chron­i­cles of Nar­nia, or maybe try to steer them to some­thing that won’t make them wake up as an ado­les­cent and real­ize, “wait a minute, that author was com­pletely insult­ing my cul­ture and religion.”

    Tim Carmody says:

    I’ll say this — both geek­dads and geek­moms enjoy the Star Wars trilo­gies, but it’s 99.9% geek­dads who would obses­sively worry about some­thing like the proper sequencing.

    BTW, my use of the term “Geek­dad” wasn’t intended to be gender-exclusionary, but to ref­er­ence the ter­rific Wired blog of that name.

    EC says:

    Saheli, this reminds me. I need to start on a Pride & Prej­u­dice & Wook­ies mash up just for your kids.

    Saheli says:

    Oh I wasn’t accus­ing you of being gen­der exclu­sive, just that it got me think­ing. I think I sub­con­sciously assumed that this was all a sub­tle way of your work­ing out the dilemma as you your­self must be fac­ing it shortly? ;-)

    Saheli says:

    That sounds like that will take time, so yes please, EC. ;-)

    EC says:

    I believe in start­ing off with the order of the orig­i­nal Tril­ogy (IV-V-VI), but I think in terms of kid friend­li­ness, if you’ve got a 4-year-old, Return of the Jedi is the right place to start. Kids love Ewoks. They are the Care Bears of the Star Wars Universe.

    Guy says:

    My son (4 years old) has already seen some of the clone wars and has some clone wars legos. For him Anakin is the hero of the story. For that rea­son we are going with the orig­i­nal three when he is ready to start, because how much of a shit sand­wich would it be to find out that the hero (in this case Anakin) turns out to be the bad guy (an espe­cially rot­ten turd who slays younglings)? It would be like find­ing out that Indian Jones was actu­ally work­ing for the Nazis the whole time.

    Robin Sloan says:

    This is SO. FASCINATING to me. In a way it re-invigorates the shock/surprise of the series! I mean, that’s pretty amaz­ing actu­ally: to con­sume this whole gigan­tic media stream that’s telling you X is the hero… and then, *errrrrk*, sud­denly X is a black-suited demon-cyborg. Cool.

    Saheli says:

    J.K. Rowl­ing really han­dled that bit cor­rectly. But Guy, that’s not com­pletely dis­sim­i­lar to my expe­ri­ence with Indi­ana Jones. “Ooh, Raiders, awe­some”. Pre­quel Sequel comes out. “Racist and demean­ing, never mind .. ”

    Jaffa says:

    I’m a firm believer in the ‘third posi­tion’. When I have kids some­day, I wouldn’t ever want to sub­ject them to the hideous­ness of the pre­quel tril­ogy. Episodes IV-VI in order, thankyou very much! Also, when the kid(s) gets older I’ll do my level best to con­ceal the exis­tence of The God­fa­ther Part III, Die Hard 2 and 4, the Lion King sequels and sea­son 3 of the O.C.

    Tim Carmody says:

    Unfor­tu­nately, ALL FOUR sea­sons of The O.C. have become required view­ing for stan­dard­ized pro­fi­ciency tests in my state. We can only hope that they change the require­ments before my son hits junior high.

    Jason Fry says:

    When I came to this pass with my kid, I advo­cated for IV-V-I-II-III-VI.

    My main goal was not to ruin the sur­prise of TESB, which makes the saga what it is. In this order, your imme­di­ate hunger for know­ing how Anakin pos­si­bly became Vader is sat­is­fied, and ROTJ works bet­ter, because you see the par­al­lels between it and ROTS and have a real fear that Luke will fall into the same trap his father did, killing the Sith appren­tice and tak­ing his place. The only thing spoiled is dis­cov­er­ing the Emperor is a mas­ter of the dark side, but that’s fairly small as spoil­ers go.

    What I hadn’t counted on was the osmo­sis of children’s social lives: My kid knew before he’d seen a sin­gle Star Wars movie that Darth Vader was Luke’s father. That made my care­ful plans kind of point­less, and so we saw them IV-V-VI, I-II-III. Oh well.

    Shalambao says:

    Wish I’d found this site before Dad made 3,5,and 9 yr olds sit through I and II, with the intent of tak­ing them straight through VI. They were so bored I had to google all the best Star Wars Legos mashups on YouTube to even peak their inter­est in IV. Care­Bears of the SW Uni­verse… if only we can get to you!!!!

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply