Building communities: Introducing Bookfuturism.com

In the fall of 2006, I was in a bad rut. An exper­i­ment in home own­er­ship had gone dis­as­trously awry and my dis­ser­ta­tion advi­sor had split Penn for Prince­ton. I spent most of my time watch­ing Star Wars and play­ing Sudoku, try­ing to ignore the hor­ri­ble stom­ach pains I had, which took months of tests and med­i­cines to finally diag­nose. I was cut off from every­one, adrift in my goals, and in dan­ger of laps­ing into what could have been seri­ous depression.

One of the things that pulled me out of that funk was a local web site called Young Philly Pol­i­tics. The site had been a group blog of some friends, just out of col­lege, most of them, who had been involved in the Howard Dean cam­paign in 2004 and an effort to upend the local DA in a pri­mary chal­lenge. Before the may­oral pri­mary, they relaunched the site to allow any­one to cre­ate a pro­file and start post­ing to the blog. Many of the posters were this core group of young pro­gres­sives, some were hacks and astro­turf plants work­ing for the var­i­ous cam­paigns, many were cranks — and still oth­ers were like me, peo­ple who were highly inter­ested in the out­come of the pri­mary but who hadn’t had much direct expe­ri­ence in Philadel­phia elec­toral politics. 

Before long, state reps and city coun­cil­men, most of the polit­i­cal reporters for local papers and radio, and even some of the may­oral can­di­dates were post­ing and com­ment­ing on the site. We all had can­di­dates we liked (and some we didn’t) and issues we pushed — even within a com­mu­nity as seem­ingly het­ero­ge­neous as pro­gres­sive blog­gers, we had huge areas of dis­agree­ment, and the debate got fierce. Some­times you would find allies, whether over issues or over a gen­eral approach, a way of writ­ing about the world. That win­ter and spring, my best friends in the world were peo­ple I had never met. 

And — it didn’t mat­ter who you were or what your cre­den­tials were. If you wrote a thought­ful, well-argued post, it got on the front page, which meant that every­one saw it. That was the moti­va­tion to say more, to do bet­ter. I was briefly famous among politi­cians and jour­nal­ists because I wrote some really good posts about local tax issues, and one about nativist atti­tudes in Philadel­phia pol­i­tics. I didn’t work for a cam­paign, or a news­pa­per. I just wrote my ass off. Where else is that even possible?

This, to me, is the beauty of writ­ing for blogs, and for Twit­ter. With time, hard work, and a few pieces of great writ­ing, it doesn’t mat­ter who you work for, what you do, or where you went to school. You can rub elbows with famous writ­ers, talk shop with peo­ple who work for your favorite mag­a­zines, and wind up get­ting writ­ten up in the news­pa­per. It’s not a mer­i­toc­racy. But it offers great mer­i­to­cratic pos­si­bil­i­ties. And maybe even more impor­tantly, it offers a promise of community.

For the past few months, I’ve writ­ten here exten­sively on the past, present, and future of read­ing. By plug­ging away at it, I feel like I’ve learned a tremen­dous amount about it, through the act of writ­ing itself. I’ve also met many bril­liant and like-minded peo­ple who are try­ing to sort this out. I’ve tried to artic­u­late both what’s wrong with how we usu­ally talk about read­ing tech­nolo­gies (whether past or present), and stake out the basic prin­ci­ples of some alter­na­tives. At every step, I’ve ben­e­fited from crit­i­cal and com­ple­men­tary com­ments and cross-posts; in some cases, I feel like I’ve helped to spark dis­cus­sions and ideas in others.

Today, I launched a project that I hope will take this fur­ther. It’s called Bookfuturism.com.

The basic premise of Bookfuturism.com is that it’s like The Daily Kos, TPM Café, or yes, Young Philly Pol­i­tics for book and media nerds. Any­one can cre­ate an account and begin cre­at­ing con­tent, whether blog posts, book pages, links to impor­tant sto­ries, or com­men­tary on another user’s entries. It has no insti­tu­tional or cor­po­rate spon­sor­ship or struc­ture. All it has are a bunch of men and women who care pas­sion­ately about read­ing and writ­ing and want to under­stand its future, so they can be a part of it.

It’s a com­mons, which means it’s a place to share news and ideas and to col­lab­o­rate on projects. There’s already one project under­way — a col­lec­tion of essays on the future of read­ing edited by Clusterflock’s Andrew Simone — that’s being devel­oped in part­ner­ship with the site. Some of the con­trib­u­tors — I’m one of them — are going to write our entries in pub­lic and incor­po­rate feed­back from the com­mu­nity before we ship it off to be printed, as a real, live phys­i­cal book. (Book­fu­tur­ists love paper and print. As Robin Sloan has said, books are great techné.) And we have other col­lab­o­ra­tions already in the works, from mee­tups to con­fer­ences to read­ing groups. If you’re inter­ested in read­ing and tech­nol­ogy, this will be the place to be.

Books are a priv­i­leged object, even in the dig­i­tal world, but I also want to try to include read­ing of all kinds. Jour­nal­ism is like­wise an impor­tant exam­ple, as are blogs and web sites. But so are text mes­sages, street signs, video games, comic books, tech­ni­cal man­u­als, restau­rant menus, and med­ical forms. In our hyper­lit­er­ate cul­ture, read­ing is every­where — and every­where it’s in flux.

I also want Bookfuturism.com to be a kind of social net­work for Book­fu­tur­ists like me. There are clear mar­kets for writ­ing by tech­no­log­i­cal tri­umphal­ists (I call these guys and girls tech­no­fu­tur­ists) and doom­say­ers (when it comes to read­ing, this group can be called book­ser­v­a­tives). It’s easy to give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to new tech­nol­ogy; it’s a lot harder to try to engage with its strengths and weak­nesses, to think of ways it could work bet­ter, to sit­u­ate it in his­tory, to study its effect on a culture. 

Book­fu­tur­ists, though, being equally peo­ple of the screen and the page, who know that both screens and pages are as var­ied and self-differentiated as the act of read­ing itself, are well sit­u­ated to offer those read­ings. How­ever, our sta­tus as mem­bers of two worlds makes it hard for us. We’re the human­ists who can’t put down our iPhones, the tech geeks who read Proust. We don’t fit in at the fac­ulty club or at a tech­nol­ogy trade show. We have a hard time explain­ing to our friends and fam­i­lies why we col­lect card cat­a­logs and buy two copies of used books — one to read, another to feed to the two-sided scan­ner. We’re the nerds among nerds.

This is also why I wanted to start this site. Because — and this might sound hokey, but I mean every word of it — there’s no rea­son why any of us should ever feel alone.

I hope you’ll come by, cre­ate an account, and start writ­ing. If you have a blog of your own already, feel free to cross-post or link to your site. (Some of you might be clever enough to auto­mate this.) If you don’t, but have some­thing to say about all this, this is a great time to start one. 

You can also post links to sto­ries, blog posts, prod­uct reviews, and new books that you think this com­mu­nity shouldn’t miss. (One of the great things about Young Philly Pol­i­tics was that dur­ing the run-up to the pri­mary, it was hands down the best news site in town — period.) This should be the place you go for news on read­ing tech­nol­ogy. At least, I’m going to do my best to make it so.

It’s an excit­ing time for read­ing now, because every­thing is in flux. Soon, you might be able to read mag­a­zines on a Hulu-like site on your gor­geous Apple tablet. Giants of pub­lish­ing will con­tinue to fall. Oth­ers will vie to replace them. Ama­zon and Barnes & Noble will sort out the pric­ing and com­pen­sa­tion mar­ket for e-books, and pub­lish­ers will fig­ure out when to release them. Book piracy might go mainstream.

And yes, human nature itself might change.

It’s all hap­pen­ing now. I’m just glad we get to see it.

4 Responses

    […] Car­mody intro­duces Bookfuturism.com: The basic premise of Bookfuturism.com is that it’s like The Daily Kos, TPMCafé, or yes, Young […]

    I adore your thoughts and your vision. Par­tic­u­larly as your signature—handwritten & signed–hovers below this blog­post, while the Snark­ma­trix awaits my reply.

    Did Young Philly Pol­i­tics inspire the microp­ol­i­tics chap­ter in New Lib­eral Arts I don’t have my copy around, and check­ing the PDF would feel like cheating.

    Tim says:

    Hi Basti! Microp­ol­i­tics was actu­ally penned by my illus­tri­ous col­league Matt Thomp­son. I think though that he had a sim­i­lar (if any­thing, a more intense because more direct) expe­ri­ence work­ing on com­mu­nity web sites in Min­neapo­lis and Colum­bia, MO.

    […] —”Build­ing Com­mu­ni­ties: Intro­duc­ing Bookfuturism.com,” Tim Car­mody, Snark­mar­ket, Decem­ber 10, 2009 […]

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply