Making music without a mask

This is, no ques­tion, my favorite new genre: the production-as-performance video. This is Pomplamoose’s Sin­gle Ladies cover, which is prob­a­bly the paragon of the form so far:

Char­ac­ter­is­tics of the pro/per video:

☑ Nor­mal duds, nor­mal envi­ron­ment. No span­dex, no fog machine.

☑ Gear. Lots of it.

☑ Sub­di­vi­sion of the video frame: over­lap­ping tracks visu­al­ized as over­lap­ping views.

☑ Per­for­mance! This isn’t just a hid­den cam­era in the stu­dio. It’s nat­ural, it’s unpretentious—but it’s still a performance.

(In some ways, this newer Pom­plam­oose video is an even bet­ter exam­ple of the pro/per form, but the music is not as per­fectly ear-tickling, so stick with Sin­gle Ladies.)

What I love about the approach is that it’s show­ing us a com­pli­cated, vir­tu­oso per­for­mance, but mak­ing it really clear and acces­si­ble at the same time. It’s enter­tain­ing, but it’s also an exer­cise in demystification—which of course is exactly the oppo­site objec­tive of every music video, ever. Their pur­pose has been to mys­tify, to mas­quer­ade, to mythol­o­gize in real-time.

Even live per­for­mance videos mys­tify in their own way: “Jeez, how did they get so good?” What I appre­ci­ate about the pro/per, at least in Pomplamoose’s hands, is that it acknowl­edges: Yes, to make music, you need a lot of tools, and you need a lot of tries. And I really like (maybe even need) the notion that things can be assem­bled. They can be built from parts, improved piece-by-piece. You don’t have to do it right the first time through. That’s what Pom­plam­oose seems to be say­ing, and showing.

I know I’ve seen some other videos in this genre, but I can’t dig any of them up… and, ha ha, search­ing for “pro­duc­tion as per­for­mance” on YouTube doesn’t get you any­where. Can you think of any?

26 Responses

    Gavin says:

    Best parts of this video: the by turns angry and con­fused “deer-in-headlights” look on the singer’s face, and also that she’s wear­ing a Bat­man t-shirt. Not-quite-flat-affect + iconic comic book logo=gold.

    Tony says:

    I love this genre (which Pom­plam­oose calls Video Songs) too. When I found the Sin­gle Ladies cover a cou­ple weeks ago on some other web site, I spent the rest of the after­noon watch­ing every video they posted. Great stuff. They seem to have a lot of fun putting these together. It actu­ally makes me kind of jealous.

    Saheli says:

    Really? I found the flat affect sort of irri­tat­ing. It made it hard to watch the video, honestly–took me about three sit­tings. She’s very pretty, but there’s some­thing about the flat affect that seems almost disin­gen­u­ously naive, an overly self-conscious pre­sen­ta­tion of inno­cence. It basi­cally summed up what I would think of as a pit­fall of this genre–a pre­cious­ness that doesn’t quite respect the viewer. The guy’s expres­sive face and phys­i­cal engage­ment with his instru­ments was just about the only thing that would pull me back into the video just when I couldn’t take it any more. 

    I did like the Bat­man t-shirt, and the back­wards throw­ing of things.

    Matan says:

    Holy mackarel of coin­ci­dence!
    Not only am I a recent avid reader of the Snark, I also JUST posted my own pro/per cover of Tina Turner’s “Sim­ply The Best”.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2o53fJOxFsY

    Feed­back me to your heart’s desire…

    Andy Baio says:

    Some that leap to mind: Kutiman’s Thru-You, Adrian Holovaty’s gypsy jazz and Chris Dod­gen har­mo­niz­ing with him­self.

    Tim Maly says:

    I was going to sug­gest Thru-You too, but you’re much faster.

    MacRae says:

    Thru-You is def­i­nitely an exam­ple of this. It is dif­fer­ent because the pro­duc­tion in that case was stitch­ing together other people’s pro­duc­tions, but it odes the lay­er­ing in the same way we see here.

    This is an awe­some exam­ple — the first I hap­pened upon — writ­ten for the Blame Drew’s Can­cer benefit:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHDiurJY3lg
    http://blamedrewscancer.com

    Greg says:

    The theremin cover of Gnarl’s Barkley’s “Crazy” is a good exam­ple of this :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW0B1sipLBI

    Scott Truitt says:

    I see the heavy influ­ence of Lasse Gjertsen’s bril­liant “Ama­teur” in the edit­ing and iso­la­tion of a sin­gle instru­ment or sound: 

    That video is almost three years old now, and it still blows me away every time I watch it. And the song itself is tops too.

    Scott Truitt says:

    Appar­ently you can’t embed the clip so here’s the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzqumbhfxRo

    Rory says:

    A lit­tle dif­fer­ent idea, but I think it tech­ni­cally fits the category:

    Acapella Thriller
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeY-6I5xqkk

    Hargrimm says:

    Wouldn’t Lasse Gjert­sen be the pin­na­cle of this form? His videos Ama­teur and Hyper­ac­tive are made entirely by cut­ting together clips of him­self mak­ing beat­box noises (Hyper­ac­tive) or play­ing indi­vid­ual notes on the piano/hitting a drum (Amateur).

    I pre­fer Ama­teur of the two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzqumbhfxRo

    Robin Sloan says:

    YES! I was try­ing to remem­ber Lasse Gjertsen’s name. I don’t know if he’s the pin­na­cle, but he’s def­i­nitely a pio­neer. Thanks for remembering/sharing.

    John Dale says:

    How about this split-screen video of lots of Mike Old­fields per­form­ing an arrange­ment of the William Tell Over­ture? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGC7OEG2TUU

    […] truly bad-ass cover, and a truly bad-ass video. I’d never heard of Pom­plam­oose before, but I am now offi­cially a […]

    dave says:

    Don’t for­get Dosh. Every show is like a song-building demo.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DooPMMGh71U

    pageslap says:

    Julia Nunes does a great pro-per video of her fan­tas­tic cover of “Sur­vivor” by Destiny’s Child, played on ukelele with multi-tracked vocals.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/jaaaaaaa#p/search/0/U-lt3vVA-4I

    […] Pom­paloose cov­ers Beyonce’s ‘Sin­gle Ladies’.  This is what is increas­ingly becom­ing known as production-as-performance art. […]

    […] via Mak­ing music with­out a mask « Snarkmarket. […]

    […] Pom­plam­oose is back with another production-as-performance video! […]

    […] In this envi­ron­ment, I think gen­er­a­tion beats recita­tion, for a lot of rea­sons. Recita­tion gets read­ers; gen­er­a­tion grows allies. You only read or watch the same recita­tion once. You might par­tic­i­pate in the same gen­er­a­tion over and over—because who knows how it might turn out this time? Really, more than any­thing, it’s that media is already full of recita­tion. So, at least for the time being, I think you get a real com­pet­i­tive advan­tage if you can show, share, and har­ness the process of cre­ation. Make music with­out a mask. […]

    Jamie says:

    The par­tic­u­lar Theresa Ander­s­son video of “Na Na Na” is what you’re tak­ing about except she does every­thing live in actual performance. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlcv4P9PAKo

    Thanks for blog­ging about this by the way. I’m very inter­ested in Pomplamoose’s music. Their stuff really is fun to watch and I got to inter­view them last month and they really are delight­ful people.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-6988-SF-Music-Examiner~y2009m11d7-Pomplamoose-the-second-live-show-the-future-of-music-empowering-musicians-and-Maru-the-cat

    Joe says:

    It’s an inter­est­ing youtube video, but they just don’t sound very good. I can’t imag­ine buy­ing the songs and lis­ten­ing to them.

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply