spacer image
spacer image

Welcome! You're looking at an archived Snarkmarket entry. We've got a fresh look—and more new ideas every day—on the front page.

July 15, 2009

<< Anthony Grafton and Digital Humanism | Two Different Ways of Looking At "Simple" >>

What Fun To Wreck [Language]

Conceptual writer Kenny Goldsmith introduces a new issue of Poetry devoted to probably the most divisive no-va-nt-guar-d writing in generations:

Our immersive digital environment demands new responses from writers. What does it mean to be a poet in the Internet age? These two movements, Flarf and Conceptual Writing, each formed over the past five years, are direct investigations to that end. And as different as they are, they have surprisingly come up with a set of similar solutions. Identity, for one, is up for grabs. Why use your own words when you can express yourself just as well by using someone else’s? And if your identity is not your own, then sincerity must be tossed out as well. Materiality, too, comes to the fore: the quantity of words seems to have more bearing on a poem than what they mean. Disposability, fluidity, and recycling: there’s a sense that these words aren’t meant for forever. Today they’re glued to a page but tomorrow they could re-emerge as a Facebook meme. Fusing the avant-garde impulses of the last century with the technologies of the present, these strategies propose an expanded field for twenty-first-century poetry. This new writing is not bound exclusively between pages of a book; it continually morphs from printed page to web page, from gallery space to science lab, from social spaces of poetry readings to social spaces of blogs. It is a poetics of flux, celebrating instability and uncertainty.

See also Ron Silliman’s response, which mostly takes issue with Goldsmith’s tongue-in-mouth claim that “disjunction is dead.”

Posted July 15, 2009 at 9:27 | Comments (2) | Permasnark
File under: Books, Writing & Such, Briefly Noted, Language


Funny -- that second blockquote was so long, I lost track of the fact that it was a blockquote, and I thought /you/ were asserting that "Darwin" was the most beautiful book of poems ever written. Which seemed like a pretty strong claim.

really good post and it reflect very much, you start to think about this debate and about the little things in the life :)

spacer image
spacer image