spacer image
spacer image

September 19, 2008

Tim's thoughts: NB: I still think you are privileging production over consumption -- to the extent that consum... >>

Towards engagement

Note 1: Robin very subtly outed me early last week, but I needed a little while to get my groove on before announcing myself: I'm augmenting my blogging here with a blog about journalism, which will contain the insights and discoveries I encounter while doing a year-long research fellowship at the new Reynolds Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri. I'll probably cross-post this over there, but I needed some of the brilliance of the Snarkmarket hive mind to help shape my thoughts on what follows. You'll find a little background for this post here.

Note 2: What follows is an attempt to thread several very obvious lines of reasoning together into something possibly slightly novel. Not at all assured of success, so consider this a preemptive apology.

I've often heard expressed a lamentation for the disappearance of a news commons. When we all no longer look to oracular information sources like Walter Cronkite and the New York Times, the thinking goes, we stand in danger of retreating into our narrow ideological corners. Under this model, the front pages of a daily general-interest newspaper form the foundation for civic dialogue.

In an intriguing paper, Indiana University professor Mark Deuze reminds us that this notion of a news commons was not presented hand-in-hand with the idea of democracy. Until recently, newspapers were constrained into having one front page for everybody. Over time, we've come to view this constraint as a feature, not a bug.

Under the news commons model, we aim for our citizens to come to the voting booth (or the city council meeting or the church supper) armed with the same information from a few reliable sources. So democracy means weighing our common set of facts against our diverse values, and reaching a conclusion respected by all. Cf. David Mindich, so you don't think I'm beating at straw men:

"One of the most powerful things about journalism itself is that it can communicate to a large audience and then we can have discussions about facts and where the facts bring us; but if we no longer are paying attention, then the facts don’t have the same weight. In the absence of fact opinion becomes more powerful. It’s not only the journalists themselves; it’s the culture apart from the news that has abandoned political discourse based on commonly agreed upon facts."

... Read more ....
mthompson-sig.gif
Posted September 19, 2008 at 4:01 | Comments (15) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

August 25, 2008

Matt Bai Talks Up The Argument

Matt says,

The Believer interviews Matt Bai. (Oh, and speaking of the NYT Magazine, I highly recommend David Leonhardt's cover story on Obamanomics if you haven't read it.)

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:28 PM

August 12, 2008

Flip-Flop, Schmip-Flop

Matt says,

MPR's Midmorning show today was about politicians flip-flopping. A tired subject, and nothing non-trite can be said about it. Still, I had to let this out:

What the news media often neglect in their coverage of the candidates is attention to their underlying governing philosophies. I think these provide a much more accurate guide to their behavior in office than their tendency to make shifts on small-bore, particular issues.

For all the media hullabaloo around "flip-flopping" in the Bush/Kerry election, we would have had a much keener idea of President Bush's flavor of governance had the media focused our attention on the core philosophies animating his team of advisers. Bush's reliance on and deference to those advisers, their belief in the unitary executive, their dogged insistence on loyalty über alles, their neoconservative interventionism -- all of these things could have been foreseen from what we knew in the run-up to the 2000 election. And it's those facts that would have given us a much, much clearer picture of how the Bush administration would administer its departments, how it would respond to events such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, a housing bust, etc.

Just take a look at one of Bush's most-cited statements since 2001, presaged in this January 2000 profile of Karl Rove by Frank Bruni: "'Anybody who gets in the way of his ambitions for the governor gets run off,' said Tom Pauken, a former chairman of the Republican Party in Texas. 'And if you're not with Karl 100 percent, you're an enemy.'"

I want to hear much, much less about flip-flops. Off-shore drilling, for all the ink given to it in the past two weeks, is an infinitesimal mote in the array of decisions and compromises #44 will have to navigate. Don't tell me what minor issues a candidate has shifted positions on, tell me what core philosophies the candidate has been consistent about, what common threads of thought weave through his speeches, his actions, and the minds of his advisers. That will give me a much clearer sense of how he'll govern.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:57 AM

July 25, 2008

The Survival of Investigative Journalism

mthompson-sig.gif
Posted July 25, 2008 at 9:07 | Comments (0) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

July 7, 2008

American Portraits

Robin says,

What do we look like?

Electorally, like this.

Religiously, like this like this. (Click around on that one. It's really a fine piece of work.)

Linguistically, like this. (It's not red vs. blue America, folks. It's pop vs. soda America. [Coke is another country.])

(Got the religion link from the just-relaunched Interactive Narratives. Aaand there goes the evening.)

Update: I pointed to the wrong version of the religion link! Click it again -- it's even crazier now.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:08 PM

June 19, 2008

The State of Investigative Journalism

Matt says,

This strikes me as a well-informed interview with Charles Lewis, "the godfather of non-profit investigative journalism," on efforts to support the form. My favorite nugget, and the one highlighted on other sites that link to this interview, is that Lewis is modeling his new endeavor on the Children's Television Workshop:

"I use the name 'Workshop' because I was always fascinated with the Children’s Television Workshop, which of course incubated Big Bird and 'Sesame Street' and other programming," he said. "I’d like to spawn new models and new entities and make it a friendly atmosphere for entrepreneurialsm — for non-profits, for-profits and hybrids of both. That’s an unusual dimension to this."

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 2:50 PM

June 17, 2008

Big River

Robin says,

WHOAH.

1. The flooding in the Midwest has been nuts.

2. No better way to experience its nuts-ness than Boston.com's The Big Picture. Just look at those photos! Wow.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 6:12 PM

June 15, 2008

The Music of News

Matt says,

In one of the many Tim Russert reminiscences circulating this weekend, Isaac Chotiner mentioned the grandiose theme music of Meet the Press, which has always been one of my favorite parts of the show. Naturally, this sent me spiraling deep into the Googleverse, where I was delighted to discover a GeoCities (!) site entitled "Network news music," containing the full themes of network news shows as they evolved over the years.

On the page for NBC, you'll find two versions of the theme for Meet the Press -- movement IV of a symphony entitled "The Mission," which NBC News commissioned from John Williams; the movement is called "The Pulse of Events." Movement I of "The Mission" opens the NBC Nightly News, and the third movement opened the Today Show for several years. Having grown up listening to many of these themes, it's a revelation to hear the motifs that reverberate through all of them when you play them in sequence.

It's finds like these that remind me how much I love the Web.

See also: this analysis of network news music from Slate.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:55 PM

June 13, 2008

Beyond the Law

Matt says,

Howard Weaver teases an upcoming McClatchy report on the wrongful detainment of (what looks to be) dozens of Guantanamo detainees:

For more than six years, the United States has held hundreds of men at Guantanamo — "the worst of the worst," in the words of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. But the truth was different. McClatchy tracked down 66 men released from Guantanamo in the most systematic survey to date of prisoners held there. Many had no connection to terrorism, but their experience turned them against America.
This sounds like it builds on the work done in the masterful This American Life segment "Habeas Schmabeus," which won a 2006 Peabody Award. (And also brought me close to tears. This American Life has done an incredible job of portraying the tragedy of wrongful imprisonment. The episode "Perfect Evidence" just wrecked me.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 2:00 PM

June 11, 2008

Abstraqtion

Matt says,

Via 3QD, George Packer in World Affairs Journal brings us one of the most textured essays I've read about Iraq in the war's five years:

For all the television news coverage, Americans have the slimmest sense of what the war actually feels and looks like—crumbling deserts, blasted buildings, angry crowds, random firefights. The image of Iraq is flickering and formless. Each year of the war seems like the last, and the patrols and meetings with Iraqis that soldiers conduct every day don’t make for good television ratings. With the exception of Falluja, there have been no memorable battles. The mundane character of counterinsurgency, the fact that journalists have become targets, and the media’s sheer lack of imagination have combined to make this most covered of modern wars one of the least vivid. Iraq is more remote in our consciousness than Vietnam ever was. It has been strangely difficult for Americans even to picture the place. I’ve been asked more times than I can remember, “What does it look like over there?” If you think of World War II or Vietnam, a dozen photographs immediately come to mind. But Iraq has not been a photographer’s war. What are its iconic images? Digital snapshots by military policemen in Abu Ghraib, footage of beheadings posted by jihadis on the Web. There was no shortage of superb photographers taking extraordinary risks in Iraq, and perhaps time will sort from their work a handful of images that will define this war in the same way that, for example, Robert Capa’s photographs of Omaha Beach and Nick Ut’s of children fleeing napalm defined earlier ones. But almost five years into this war, there is only blank space where America’s picture of Iraq should be.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:36 PM

June 7, 2008

Robin's thoughts: That last point of your resonates most w/ me, Matt. Seems like we're in a moment of unprecedented... >>

Newspaper Eulogy: A Footnote

At the end of that last session, I got to ask my question, which was sort of a continuation of the train of thought begun in this post.

So to sum up the session, five people from Newspaperland spent an hour in somewhat gross adulation of The Newspaper. They each began their remarks with an earnest tale of how they became swept up in the newspaper biz, and concluded by bemoaning the misfortunes that have befallen their beloved industry. And then, goaded on by the moderator, each panelist discoursed at length on such thrilling topics as "Why everyone should give money to a newspaper" and "Why reporters should get paid more."

When we finally got to the question-and-answer part of the session, I asked, "What do we mean when we talk about 'saving The Newspaper'?" A newspaper is actually a collection of rather disparate things, I pointed out. And I inferred from the panelists' remarks that some of The Newspaper's contents seem more urgent candidates for salvation than others.

... Read more ....
mthompson-sig.gif
Posted June 7, 2008 at 6:07 | Comments (4) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism
Matt's thoughts: Sorry, NewsCat. I was too busy trying to get the moderator to call on me to liveblog at that poin... >>

NCMR '08: Newspapers, not dead yet?

mthompson-sig.gif
Posted June 7, 2008 at 2:33 | Comments (2) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism
Noah Kunin's thoughts: Thanks for the live coverage! Very nice.... >>

NCMR '08: New media, new models session

mthompson-sig.gif
Posted June 7, 2008 at 12:38 | Comments (1) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

June 6, 2008

NCMR '08: Free speech session

mthompson-sig.gif
Posted June 6, 2008 at 11:44 | Comments (0) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

April 30, 2008

Under Orders, Under Fire

Matt says,

Forgot where it was linked, but some blogger recently referred to a famous 1996 essay on the media by James Fallows that I had never read. The essay begins with a description of a public television broadcast called "Under Orders, Under Fire":

Most of the panelists were former soldiers talking about the ethical dilemmas of their work. The moderator was Charles Ogletree, a professor at Harvard Law School, who moved from panelist to panelist asking increasingly difficult questions in the law school's famous Socratic style.

During the first half of the show Ogletree made the soldiers squirm about ethical tangles on the battlefield. The man getting the roughest treatment was Frederick Downs, a writer who as a young Army lieutenant in Vietnam had lost his left arm in a mine explosion. ...

Then Ogletree turned to the two most famous members of the evening's panel, better known even than Westmoreland. These were two star TV journalists: Peter Jennings, of World News Tonight and ABC, and Mike Wallace, of 60 Minutes and CBS.

Ogletree brought them into the same hypothetical war. He asked Jennings to imagine that he worked for a network that had been in contact with the enemy North Kosanese government. After much pleading Jennings and his news crew got permission from the North Kosanese to enter their country and film behind the lines. Would Jennings be willing to go? Of course, he replied. Any reporter would—and in real wars reporters from his network often had.

But while Jennings and his crew were traveling with a North Kosanese unit, to visit the site of an alleged atrocity by U.S. and South Kosanese troops, they unexpectedly crossed the trail of a small group of American and South Kosanese soldiers. With Jennings in their midst the Northern soldiers set up an ambush that would let them gun down the Americans and Southerners.

What would Jennings do? Would he tell his cameramen to "Roll tape!" as the North Kosanese opened fire? What would go through his mind as he watched the North Kosanese prepare to fire?

Fascinating, right? Read the rest of the essay, but I got you one better. Turns out the episode (and the series it was a part of) is entirely available online.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:03 PM

April 16, 2008

Tim's thoughts: Yeah. You know how I <a href="http://short-schrift.blogspot.com/2008/04/narrowing-of-politics.htm... >>

Somebody, Please Make Some News Tonight

For somebody who works in journalism, I really strongly dislike the American press sometimes. It boils over into out-and-out gall during Presidential elections, when news is scarce, and reporters start slavering after the musings of pundits like starved dogs. We find ourselves incapable of sustaining any significant focus on issues, or even stylistic distinctions between candidates that have real implications on how they will lead. Instead, we seed these manufactured clouds of perceptions and expectations over and over, hoping against hope to produce a storm. And if we should happen upon a gaffe or a gotcha moment, we actually praise the gods and we feast.

Bittergate, day six.

... Read more ....
mthompson-sig.gif
Posted April 16, 2008 at 8:39 | Comments (1) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism, Snarkpolitik

February 22, 2008

Peter's thoughts: Thanks! I mostly just thought that it was funny that RSS, yesterday's (or perhaps the day before... >>

Compute! Report!

Yo! I'm at the Computational Journalism conference at Georgia Tech. So far it is awesome.

I'm going to attempt to liveblog with a new tool I just learned about here -- it's past the jump.

Follow-up: My favorite new discovery from yesterday was probably Mark Hansen from UCLA and his Sensorbase project. Also, I gotta admit, Cover It Live is kinda cool.

Today: Andrew Haeg from MPR's Public Insight Journalism program is blowing my mind. The work they do isn't massive in scale, but it's exactly right: They're building a database of citizen expertise over time, and they can query it in lots of interesting ways. It's a complete reinvention of sourcing. It's not only electronic, either: They often bridge the gap and bring members of their database together in the physical world.

Something else: Just heard a great analogy: Wally Dean from the Committee of Concerned Journalists recounts the introduction of Doppler radar in local news stations. It was a grafting of (then very new) technology into newsrooms that was hugely successful. What's the next Doppler radar? What's the next bit of technology we can use inventively in the context of news? (Especially, perhaps, local news?)

... Read more ....
Robin-sig.gif
Posted February 22, 2008 at 1:06 | Comments (3) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

February 14, 2008

EveryBlock Confidential

Robin says,

Rex continues his recent run of awesome, kinda-sorta-long-form original content: Here's a nuanced interview with Adrian Holovaty about EveryBlock. (Matt, note the mention of machine-readable metadata for "news blobs"! EPICBlock, yo!)

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 6:29 PM

February 9, 2008

The Forbidden Fantasy of Utter Upeaval

Robin says,

This WaPo story by Hank Stuever is terrific, and weird, and a good example of that ripped-from-its-context thing the web does so well: I started reading it and had no idea what was going on. You'll see what I mean.

Even when do you figure out what you're reading, it never quite becomes normal. The story is totally fractured, almost impressionist -- but to good effect. Steuver is a terrific writer, and his subject matter is sublime: American culture as it's experienced in places other than New York and San Francisco. His book Off Ramp is terrific, and its subtitle says it all: "Adventures and Heartache in the American Elsewhere."

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:07 PM

January 23, 2008

EveryBlock

Matt says,

Adrian, Wilson and co. have launched Everyblock, a mashup of several information sources down to the block level for different cities (currently Chicago, New York and San Francisco). The site is very pretty, especially the maps, and as you would expect, there's fun data hidden beneath every click. But it's otherwise hard for me to evaluate how cool it is, since I don't live in any of the included cities. How about it, residents?

Update: One surprise ... no RSS feeds? (Except this one.)

Update 2: Rex reminds me ... Poynter Online interview w/ Adrian (which is how I found out it launched).

Comments (4) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:52 PM

January 22, 2008

The Atlantic Rides Again

Robin says,

The Atlantic, favorite magazine of my middle youth, was kinda lame for a while there, but it's been getting good again -- a fact that had been bumming me out because, of course, I couldn't link to the subscriber-only stories.

Until today.

So let us celebrate the magazine's resurgence and web-savvy with a couple of pointers:

  • The new James Fallows piece on China is exactly what got me into the Atlantic in the first place: Themes of politics and economics, hugely abstract ideas, giant global actors and their dilemmas, etc. I love it that there's none of the usual attempt to concrete-ize and personalize here: No narrative intro with a factory worker in China, for instance. The only narrative in the piece involves the voyage of a U.S. dollar to China and back. I could not love it more.
  • Caitlin Flanagan's piece about Katie Couric was the last one I read in this issue, and I almost didn't read it at all. Thank goodness my train was slow, because it was a revelation, in large part because it's as much about Caitlin Flanagan as it is about Katie Couric. Beautifully written, too: Flanagan is a great storyteller and has perfect "tone control," if you know what I mean.
  • Comments (4) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:44 PM

January 10, 2008

Inside the Black Box

Robin says,

The best thing about it only being January 10 is that I can say, without reservation, that this is the best thing I've read all year: n+1's interview with a hedge fund manager. It includes a useful window into a little-known, but super-interesting, component of modern markets: quantitative trading driven by computer programs!

n+1: And so the computers themselves are making these trades?

HFM: You build the models and the computer does the trading. You actually do all the analysis. But it’s too many stocks for a human brain to handle, so it’s really just guys with a lot of physics and hardcore statistics backgrounds who come up with ideas about models that might lead to excess return and then they test them and then basically all these models get incorporated into a bigger system that trades stocks in an automated way.

n+1: So the computers are running the...

HFM: Yeah, the computer is sending out the orders and doing the trading.

n+1: It’s just a couple steps from that to the computers enslaving --

HFM: Yes, but I for one welcome our computer trading masters.

People actually call it "black box trading," because sometimes you don’t even know why the black box is doing what it's doing, because the whole idea is that if you could, you should be doing it yourself. But it's something that's done on such a big scale, a universe of several thousand stocks, that a human brain can’t do it in real time. The problem is that the DNA of a lot of these models is very, very similar, it's like an ecosystem with no biodiversity because most of the people who do stat-arb can trace their lineage, their intellectual lineage, back to four or five guys who really started the whole black box trading discipline in the '70s and '80s.

If you read on from that point in the article you'll learn about "ten-sigma events" -- if that doesn't sound like something from a dystopian anime series, I don't know what does.

There's also some really great discussion -- and explication -- of the whole sub-prime thing. It's long, but the conversational style makes it pretty digestible.

(Thanks to PoN for the link.)

Comments (4) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:48 AM

January 8, 2008

Pundits: The Eyeball Monster

Matt says,

mr_i.jpg There's a giant eyeball monster in Super Paper Mario that tracks you in every direction as you move around a room and shoots laser beams at you. To defeat it, Mario has to flip into 3D mode and run around and around it until it tries to shoot, gets confused, and implodes.

Eyeball monster = media pundits. Mario = '08 Presidential candidates. It's fun to watch.

Oh, and btw: Speaking of life imitating Mario, Andy Towle's right. The video for Janet Jackson's new single "Feedback" is so Super Mario Galaxy.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:16 PM

November 1, 2007

Bernanke and the Fed

Robin says,

Absolutely terrific piece of financial journalism by Greg Ip in the WSJ. He renders the Fed and its work as it truly is: super-interesting, super-important... and dramatic!

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:51 AM

October 27, 2007

The Lost Columnist

Robin says,

So, this Washington Monthly piece is nowhere near as glib as its title makes it seem: Why Is Bob Herbert Boring?

In fact it turns out to be a sophisticated, sensitive exploration of the paradox of NYT columnist Bob Herbert (and, by extension: informative, well-meaning journalism in general): This is important stuff. It's largely correct. Why doesn't it... grab me?

It's a good reminder for journalists of all stripes, and maybe bloggers, too: You have to do more than just report and present. Truth and clarity, difficult as they are to achieve on their own, aren't enough.

Ya gotta have style, too.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:32 PM

October 24, 2007

Primary Sources

Robin says,

Current citizen journalism covers the fires in Southern California.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:25 AM

October 22, 2007

Drudge

Robin says,

So, see if you can guess which two words I love in this graf:

His status was solidified after the 2004 election at a steakhouse dinner in Miami with Mr. Drudge, who for all his renown in politics is a somewhat spectral presence who rarely agrees to meet with political operatives or journalists and who did not respond to requests for an interview for this article.

"Spectral presence"! Somehow that just bowled me over.

And, somewhat more seriously, wow:

The Democrats have come to believe, Mr. Dyke said, what Republicans have always thought: “No single person is more relevant to shaping the media environment in a political campaign.”

This, from a webpage still rocking a 1994-era design. Pretty amazing.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 6:31 PM

October 19, 2007

Megacities

Robin says,

We have talked about cities lots (!) here on Snarkmarket. Now two of my favorite Current colleagues, Darren Foster and Mariana van Zeller, are doing a pod about our planet's urban future. Chime in if you've got thoughts. Open-source TV production whaaat!

(P.S. I know I know, it's all Current links all of a sudden. I'll backfill with nerdy journal articles as soon as I have time to dig back into Bloglines, promise.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:38 AM

September 30, 2007

Density

Robin says,

I've mentioned Radio Lab before, but Tim just posted about an episode I hadn't heard and I downloaded it and IT BLEW MY MIND.

You've got to give it a listen if you haven't already. Immediately, you'll hear a huge difference from the boring march of words that characterizes every other radio show, ever. On Radio Lab, the words and sonic interjections are fragmented, tiled, cross-cut, layered. There's just so much more to absorb; it lights your brain up. Radio Lab is DENSE.

This is how all explanatory media should feel. We're ready for it.

P.S. I don't want to focus entirely on the meta-method stuff, though, 'cause the ideas and the reporting are also sublime. This is a must-listen.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:45 PM

September 24, 2007

Maximum Mumbai

Robin says,

Enjoyed this NYT slideshow about Mumbai. Want to visit. Bad.

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:14 AM

September 19, 2007

Look On My Works, Ye Mighty

Matt says,

If you weren't paying attention, Kottke's begun excavating the archival treats freed by the demise of TimesSelect.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:13 PM

August 25, 2007

No Words

Robin says,

The NYT's Chang W. Lee in China. Bump it up to full screen and just watch. What a brilliant piece of journalism.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:28 PM

August 22, 2007

A Database of Facts

Robin says,

PolitiFact from the St. Pete Times and CQ. Backstory.

Great power can flow from default reference link status; think Wikipedia, IMDB, etc. Can PolitiFact achieve default reference link status for political claims? Would be very cool if it did. Snarkmarket will assist with link love whenever possible.

As an aside: It's totally rad to see the St. Pete Times stepping up in a national way like this. More, more!

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:10 PM

August 7, 2007

Tim's thoughts: I have another thought, and it's not unrelated to my mention of Mad Men and The Soprano... >>

The Attention Deficit: The Need for Timeless Journalism

In Romenesko Letters today, Gordon Trowbridge makes a very good point about the coverage before the collapse of 35W: the press did see this one coming. Over the past several years, newspapers have published a number of prominent investigative stories on bridge/highway deficiencies. My own paper published a front-page story in 2001 headlined "A bridge too far gone? Repairs overdue on many spans." An excerpt:

Bridge work is getting increasingly expensive as a bubble of structures built after World War II are wearing out and requiring major renovation or replacement during the next 20 years. [The 35-W bridge was built in 1967.]

And some state highway officials warn that Minnesota isn't keeping up.

... Read more ....
mthompson-sig.gif
Posted August 7, 2007 at 7:35 | Comments (6) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

August 4, 2007

Favorite Voices, New Mediums

Robin says,

Hendrik Hertzberg has a blog and the first word, against all odds, is: "Bam."

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 4:46 PM

August 3, 2007

Breaking News on Wikipedia

Robin says,

Someone pointed out today that Wikipedia has, very quietly, become an excellent synthesizer of big breaking news stories. For instance: the I-35 collapse.

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:39 PM

July 30, 2007

With Great Power Comes...

Robin says,

James Fallows on two-tiered stock structure in media ownership:

The only justification for "Class B" shares giving special voting power to the Sulzberger family at the Times, the Graham family at the Post, and the Bancroft family at the Journal is the assumption that the families will weigh other factors in deciding how the news operation should be run.

That is: other potentially non-economic factors.

Of course, Class B shares aren't just an old-school thing. Guess which other company uses them to give super-votes -- and, potentially, the power to defy the market -- to founders and top executives?

Google.

Update: James Fallows notes the Google gambit too.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:37 PM

July 16, 2007

Prisoner of Conscience

Robin says,

Snarkmarket favorite Rachel Leow reports on the politically-motivated imprisonment of a Malaysian blogger:

Nathaniel Tan, a prominent political blogger, activist and staff member of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) was detained incommunicado and was not given any grounds for his arrest, according to Malaysiakini. He was detained by three plainclothed policemen at 4:30 p.m. on 13 July in his office at Phileo Damansara.

According to Malaysiakini, police seized Nat's laptop, CDs, personal computer, and oddly enough, his computer monitor.

Ng Eng Kiat, a colleague and part-time journalist who had been present at the time of arrest, said police had not given a clear reason for Nat's arrest. Even when asked directly, the policemen had assured them that it was not an arrest. They "hanya nak siasat sedikit" (just wanted to chat). Upon complying, however, Nat was, as Jeff Ooi dryly puts it, "spirited away" (that is to say, categorically not arrested).

Tan is still in custody. It's interesting to see an earlier version of the story on Rachel's blog -- in some ways I prefer it.

Because I cannot resist going meta on these things: I like Rachel's work on this a lot because it is citizen journalism in a deeper than usual sense -- not just snapshots from a scene, mutely presented, but a smart, independent analysis of an important story in a situation where the pro media, such as it is, just isn't cutting it.

See also (though less urgently): Off the Bus.

Incidentally: I am reminded of my days writing letters in MSU's chapter of Amnesty International. It's been a while since I checked in with Amnesty... I wonder if they are doing anything new or Web 2.0-y?

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:56 PM

July 15, 2007

The Rule of Reason

Robin says,

Bill Moyers talks to Bruce Fein, a lawyer, and John Nichols, a journalist, about impeachment. Every time Moyers puts something on air it reminds me what "discourse" is actually supposed to look like.

If you didn't see it, the first episode of his new show, about the lead-up to the Iraq war, is gut-wrenching. It's all stuff you know and remember, of course, but it's still pretty terrible to see it all laid out so starkly.

Comments (13) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:49 PM

June 19, 2007

The Assassin's Blog

Robin says,

Wow. Speaking of morally serious reporters who write about Iraq, did you know George Packer had a blog on the New Yorker site? Yeah, neither did anybody else. CJR clues us in.

Packer's book The Assassin's Gate was more deserving of a WMYW warning than anything I've read in a long time. I am totally looking forward to a steadier stream of his thoughts and observations.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:39 PM

Baghdad Observer

Robin says,

Leila Fadel is McClatchy's bureau chief in Baghdad; her blog is riveting. I'd tuned out a lot of the news out of Iraq 'til I subscribed.

I almost want to put some tag on it, though, like NSFW, except somehow warning you how just utterly harrowing and beyond the pale it is:

Back at the office the reports started to come in. Five Sunni mosques attacked in Basra, three set on fire or bombed in Baghdad, three south of Baghdad. Muted compared to last years attacks. I sent everyone home before the three-day-curfew began, save two of our guys.

Sahar, one of our Iraqi reporters, called and told me about a woman in Adhamiya. Her husband, her protector, could not get home before the curfew started. As darkness fell upon Baghdad the cancer-ridden woman shook with fear, her three children around her, as mortars fell nearby. She would be alone tonight and two more nights.

I called downstairs for stress-relievers -- chocolate and coffee. One of my favorite hotel staffers brought them up from the cafeteria.

"What do you think about this?" I asked.

"Just drop two nuclear bombs on us and finish this," Dhia said wiping his hands together as if to wash his hands of Iraq.

"But we'd die," I replied.

"So what. I just want to finish from this," he said. With a sad laugh he walked away toting his metal tray.

Here's Fadel's intro to the blog.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:16 AM

June 7, 2007

Families and Their Food

Robin says,

The best part of TIME's website is the photo essays, hands-down. Here's a new one: portraits of families around the world, along with the food they eat. They're by Peter Menzel -- they're from his book -- and they're beautiful.

Via the excellent Eyeteeth.

P.S. For some reason I was particularly charmed by the Melander family of Bargteheide.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 9:32 PM

May 26, 2007

Gray Lady Gaming

Robin says,

All right. All right. I think I might finally have to break down and get TimesSelect. The NYT is running Flash games as editorials.

(Actually, I think it's a huge mistake to put these games -- especially the first few! -- behind the pay wall. They are viral material. So maybe capitulation would send the wrong signal?)

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:10 PM

April 30, 2007

Talking Points TV

Robin says,

Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo is doing a videoblog. It's pretty lo-fi, but I like it, especially because I totally cannot keep up with TPM for the life of me -- just way too much detail -- and this provides a nice distillation. Worth a peek.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:38 PM

April 29, 2007

The Atlantic Rides Again

Robin says,

The Atlantic Monthly, along with Wired, was basically my introduction to the awesome interestingness of the world. So I am happy to see it making some smart new moves on the web:

20070429_ataltnci.jpg

With the exception of Sullivan, who I never really got into, this is the beginning of my ideal blog lineup. Yglesias, Douthat, and Fallows are all well worth your time.

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:27 PM

April 18, 2007

Virginia Tech, and Taking Control of Your Representation

Robin says,

A Virginia Tech student named Jason Piatt just looks into his webcam and talks:

I guess the internet's a pretty powerful thing... I didn't realize how many people are really on Facebook and MySpace and all that, but all day long people have been sending me emails, messages, and everything... "I wanna do this interview, I wanna do this interview."

At first it was kinda exciting because I felt like people really care about what I have to say out there... I'm doing somebody some good, I'm making a difference. And then after a while I realized, like, no matter how many times I told the same story, that I just told you... people still wanted to hear it.

And I would tell 'em, I'd say, I don't have anything, you watch CNN right? You see these other things... that's all I got.

Fix an image of the standard cable news presentation in your mind -- helicopter shot, yammering voices, text crawl -- and then watch this. It's riveting.

Update: This is on Current TV now. Here's the broadcast version (a little tighter).

Related: This Ypulse post is fascinating. A Facebook group created as a memorial to one of the VA Tech victims leads with this warning:

**ATTENTION NEWS MEDIA**

NEWS MEDIA DO NOT have permission to use photographs, quotes, or any information from the site, AND you do not have permission to contact group members.

Wow. There's something important going on here.

Comments (5) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:50 AM

February 24, 2007

The Wisdom... or Something... of Crowds

Robin says,

An interesting thing happened at Jim Romenesko's Starbucks Gossip site recently: Somebody slipped Romenesko what appeared to be an internal email from Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz. Romenesko posted it, with the caveat: I have no idea if this is real.

Soon after, its legitimacy was confirmed, and now it's been covered by the big guys. (It's actually a pretty interesting story -- Schultz is warning that Starbucks has lost its way.)

But before that happened, Starbucks Gossip readers were hashing out the likely legitimacy of the email on their own. If you read some of the long comment thread, you get an awfully good snapshot of web-ified group discussion today: smart; informed (most of the commenters are Starbucks baristas!); opinionated; and, er, often wrong.

No specific conclusions from me (maybe you have some?) but I just thought it was a data point interesting enough to share.

(Starbucks Gossip is great, by the way -- I think I might read it with more excitement than I do the other one these days.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:17 AM

February 8, 2007

Usemonopolies

Matt says,

Jonathan Lethem has plagiarized together an entrancing paean to intellectual theft:

Artists, or their heirs, who fall into the trap of attacking the collagists and satirists and digital samplers of their work are attacking the next generation of creators for the crime of being influenced, for the crime of responding with the same mixture of intoxication, resentment, lust, and glee that characterizes all artistic successors. By doing so they make the world smaller, betraying what seems to me the primary motivation for participating in the world of culture in the first place: to make the world larger.
You might not agree with all of it, but boy howdy, is it a rollicking great read. Definitely do not miss the footnotes:
The effort of preserving another's distinctive phrases as I worked on this essay was sometimes beyond my capacities; this form of plagiarism was oddly hard work.

Cf. this beautiful Slate photo-essay on visual plagiarism.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:09 PM

February 7, 2007

Now Let's Turn to Someone Much Younger

Robin says,

Steve Outing asked me about the future of news for a column in Editor and Publisher. Here's what I said:

"I think 'news' just becomes a less distinct category. You don't sit down with a newspaper, or even a news website, or even a super wireless e-paper device, for 10 minutes in the morning to very formally 'get your news.' Rather, you get all sorts of news and information -- from the personal to the professional to the political -- throughout the day, in little bits and bursts, via many different media. With any luck, in 5-10 years the word 'news' will be sort of confusing: Don't you just mean 'life'?"

Honestly though, the idea that I'm most excited about...

Sloan elaborates: "A key point is that news will continue to be delivered on many media -- websites, blogs, TV, phones, pamphlet-y things, those little java jackets they have at coffee shops, whatever. It's not about everything going digital and never seeing a molecule of real matter again. But it IS about the death of the monolithic news experience."

...is the Starbucks News Service!

You think I'm kidding, but I'm not!

Comments (14) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:17 PM

January 26, 2007

Afghanistan 1997-2007

Robin says,

My Current colleague Mitch Koss has some amazing notes on Afghanistan up over on the Current blog.

P.S. An updated Current home page launched today -- it's dope.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 5:36 PM

January 9, 2007

Real Citizen Journalism

20070109_PIWDW.jpg

One depressing feature of the internet today is that there is exponentially more meta-commentary about the promise and potential of citizen journalism than there is actual, you know, citizen journalism. At least if you parse 'journalism' in any remotely traditional sense: fact-based, disinterested reporting.

One amazing exception is the Press Institute for Women in the Developing World. It's a small non-profit founded by Cristi Hegranes, who was a summer fellow at Poynter and a reporter at SF Weekly before jumping ship to start her own thing.

Her background shows: The Press Institute distinguishes itself from other citizen-journalism ventures in that it mixes an egalitarian, grassroots spirit with an unusual dedication to the core values of journalism. The starting point of her organization's work is training: The Press Institute takes citizens and makes them journalists.

You can see the result on PIWDW's site. A pilot program in Mexico is up and running, with citizen journalists there writing stories every month. (Check 'em out at the top of this page -- what a great group!)

A new program is slated to start in Nepal in March.

(Full disclosure: I am on PIWDW's Board of Directors. I am also president of the Cristi Hegranes Fan Club.)

Robin-sig.gif
Posted January 9, 2007 at 9:26 | Comments (0) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

January 4, 2007

The Question Is Posed

Matt says,

What are the benefits of following the news?

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:55 PM

December 26, 2006

Boxing Day Surprise

Matt says,

Heeeeey, my paper just got sold. Howard, does this mean I don't get to post on Etaoin Shrdlu anymore?

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:27 PM

December 25, 2006

fernando paulsen's thoughts: Robin, I just came back from Boston with my wife, where we did the roadshow to go to Harvard next... >>

The Intelligence Pyramid

More thought provocations via Khoi Vinh. In this interview with Science of Shopping author Paco Underhill, he drops this nugget:

I think of knowledge as a pyramid. At the bottom of the pyramid is data; the next layer of the pyramid is information; the next layer of the pyramid is intelligence; and the top of the pyramid is wisdom. I like to tell my clients that we’re in the business of giving them intelligence and wisdom, and if they want to collect data, or if they want to collect information and process it themselves, that’s their business.
Of course, this pyramid is hardly Underhill's invention, but I like that he specializes. I'd swap "knowledge" with "intelligence," as I have. Totally an aesthetic thing, I just think "intelligence" is a word more suited to apply to the whole structure. Pure data can be characterized, in the CIA sense, as "intelligence," while "knowledge" is a trickier fit. I like this explanation of the four concepts.

I'd say journalism suffers from not articulating these concepts as decisively as Underhill does. When asked what we're "in the business of" giving to folks, most journalists would probably shrug and say, "Journalism." Which is absolutely not a separate plank on the intelligence pyramid, our overinflated egos notwithstanding. (Some would answer "stories," which I think is a less-than-artful way of dodging the question.) If you squint your eyes a little bit, you could might imagine journalism's version of this pyramid as Underhill's version, split into two halves -- the "objective" half (data and information), and the "subjective" half (knowledge and wisdom). Squint a little bit more, and you might even see how these concepts form your average newspaper -- data and information being the substance of the reporting and presenting process, and knowledge and wisdom being fodder for news analyses, commentaries and editorials.

But I've seen reporters recoil at the notion that the foundation for all their work is gathering data. And while most journalists seem to be content with providing mere "information" for a time, 90% of them seem to harbor secret ambitions to impart "wisdom." It would be worth saying, I think, that actually gathering data is a noble end in itself, as is providing information. It would also be worth giving more journalists access throughout their careers to the fields of knowledge- and wisdom-dispensing. (I.e. Rather more clear subjectivity added to the "objectivity" soup.)

mthompson-sig.gif
Posted December 25, 2006 at 8:46 | Comments (11) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism, Society/Culture

December 4, 2006

A Story, a Lost Pet, a Garage Sale, an Event

Robin says,

I kind of love the submission taxonomy presented on Pegasus News's neighborhood pages. Yo, that's what it's all about.

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:17 PM

November 20, 2006

Kill Me Now

Robin says,

Michael Hirschorn leads his whither-newspapers story with EPIC. And this is, honestly, one of the best lines written about it, ever:

As a piece of pop futurism, EPIC 2014 is both brilliant and brilliantly self-subverting (at once inevitable and preposterous).

Oh yeah, by the way, IT'S IN THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY.

Update: Jon Fine mentions Hirschorn's story and points to some pretty interesting news: Two big-time WaPo reporters are striking out on their own to start a political news site.

Comments (4) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:39 PM

November 9, 2006

Frontline Does Kiva

Robin says,

You know I love Kiva; now there's a mini-doc about it posted on Frontline World. The piece has a great opening sequence, cross-cutting between a Ugandan with a peanut butter business and a San Franciscan with, um, a nice kitchen.

Globalization!

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:11 AM

November 8, 2006

The Wit and Wisdom of Donald Rumsfeld

Robin says,

This is a pretty snarky photo essay for TIME! Familiar with the meme, of course, but have never seen it so well-executed.

Slide four sorta sums it all up, doesn't it?

Also: a somewhat less-snarky photo essay on China. You can get 'em in a feed, you know!

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:00 PM

October 11, 2006

Was Media Ever About Content?

Robin says,

An old colleague at Poynter used to hate it when people used the words "media" and "news" interchangeably. Not the same thing, he'd say. News means standards, values, a mission; media just means... eyeballs.

Now, over at Publishing 2.0, talking about Google and YouTube, Scott Karp cites this bit of reflection from Andy Kessler:

Who are the next media moguls and to whom do they have to sell their souls for the priviledge? The $165 billion question left unanswered by this deal is: What is media anymore? Can you just slap videos up on the Web and become a younger and more vibrant Rupert Murdoch or Sumner Redstone?

And then Karp adds:

Does media have anything to do with content anymore, or is it all about aggregating people's attention by any means? Was media ever really about content?

I can't say I fully understand it, but I feel like this might be an interesting and illusion-piercing insight.

Lately, Al Gore likes to use the word "thrall" when talking about climate change. For example:

Our biggest challenge, our biggest foe, is thrall. The word sounds ancient, but it means anything that imprisons our thinking and prevents us from seeing the reality of our situation.

And I wonder if there aren't some ideas about media, content, and journalism that we are still in thrall to, and haven't realized it yet...

(The dots mean I don't know what they are either, not that I do and am not telling you.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 6:15 PM

October 4, 2006

Daily Show vs. Broadcast News?

Matt says,

Which has more substantive political coverage?

Would you believe neither? That's what a telecommunications professor at Indiana U. found when she analyzed the content of The Daily Show and put it up next to a network newscast. (Card-ial.)

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:20 PM

September 27, 2006

Law & Order: Special Ethics Unit

Robin says,

Oh man, this is hot: Joe Strupp profiles our Poynter peeps (Kelly McBride, Bob Steele, Kenny Irby and more) and dubs them the "Special Ethics Unit." Like Poynter itself, the whole thing unapologetically mixes the super-serious and the somewhat silly:

Steele's colleagues at Poynter understand that because ethical questions can pop up suddenly, often at inconvenient hours, they'll continue to be called on at odd times to provide help to journalists. Kelly McBride, for example, is realistic about the on-call nature of her job.

Many such tales abound, often involving her children in tow. "I remember standing in Target shopping for a birthday present with one of my daughter's friends and doing a consultation on the coverage surrounding [rape accusations against] Kobe Bryant," says the mother of three. "I was a little self-conscious."

So, so cool!

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:03 AM

September 15, 2006

Activate

Robin says,

By the way, do you guys subscribe to Activate? It's a weekly world news filter from Flavorpill. I really really like it.

The newsletter very diligently ignores the conventional wisdom and consensus news judgment; its story choice is almost brazen in its divergence from the AP/NYT agenda.

Pretty great preamble to their mission statement, too:

News is personal. We think it always was.

Lately, though, that conviction has been lost in a sea of impersonal, politically correct news sources that have volume, but no point of view or larger context. We miss finding smart connections between front-page stories and the important -- but often neglected -- ones. Meanwhile, links to "1,339 related" articles on massive news sites don't activate your mind, but rather, overload it.

I think that last line is actually quite profound. Mega-scale algorithms are great for searching, but horrible for meaning.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 5:51 PM

September 11, 2006

The Art of Verification

Robin says,

This is, by a wide margin, the coolest use of EPIC I have yet seen: A professor at Lehigh Carbon Community College in Pennsylvania sets it up as the subject of an exercise in critical media consumption and information verification. Nice use of a wiki, too. Note the contribution of student sleuth Jennifer Jones midway down.

Comments (10) | Permasnark | Posted: 9:15 PM

September 1, 2006

We've Been Liveblogged

Robin says,

Matt and I gave the opening talk at SND Orlando this morning and, in what I think is a first for us, we got liveblogged. With a cameraphone no less!

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 1:24 PM

August 29, 2006

Buy This Book

Robin says,

writingtools.jpg

Buy this book!

Okay I'm biased. I used to work at the Poynter Institute, where Roy Peter Clark hangs his hat, and I learned lots from him. Much of it was stuff that's now encoded in this book, actually. But even so, I am so glad to have it all in one place. Even better, the volume is a wonder to behold: simple, slim, elegant.

And, you know, I can tell just from the feel of it that this is the kind of book that will age like good leather shoes: One day it will be totally worn out and beaten up from overuse, but somehow handsomer for it.

Dude, I have a question though -- even when you're Roy Peter Clark, how do you score blurbs from Mark Bowden, Sister Helen Prejean, Eugene Patterson, Howell Raines, Tom French, and David Von Drehle?

Indeed, Von Drehle writes: "Roy is the Obi-Wan Kenobi of writing teachers..." Just for the record, if one of his Snarkmarket students is Anakin Skywalker (i.e. initially promising but ultimately a force for total evil) it is definitely Matt.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 9:13 PM

August 22, 2006

This Blogpost Automatically Generated in 0.03 Seconds

Robin says,

Thomson and Reuters run stories written by computers! COMPUTERS I say! Will Sullivan with the deets and the awesomely appropriate frame-grab.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:28 AM

August 9, 2006

It's Inevitable

Robin says,

I was just checking out Google Video's new ad system and happened to click on this video, a Charlie Rose episode featuring Thomas Friedman.

And it struck me: This man is going to run for political office.

Maybe not soon, but some day. Just listen to the way he talks! And come on, he's rich!

When it happens, just remember: Snarkmarket called it.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:58 AM

August 3, 2006

Generation Debt

Robin says,

Correction: THIS is my new favorite blog. Anya Kamenetz writes about finance from a 25-year-old's perspective. She just wrote a book, too.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:59 AM

August 1, 2006

My New Favorite Blog

Robin says,

OMG! Muckraking Mom! Raison d'etre:

I think there’s a need for a website exclusively devoted to muckraking moms -- moms who discover the political machinery behind the politics of our every day lives and expose it. Eventually, I hope this site will grow to include the contributions of a veritable army of muckraking moms, and dads too.
Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:31 PM

July 27, 2006

Lesson 2: The Proper Use of Plasma Grenades

Robin says,

Sooo, yeah, this is probably my favorite paragraph in any news story so far this year:

Gaming-lessons.com says its youngest "Halo 2" instructor is 8-year-old New Yorker Victor De Leon III -- better known by his online gamer name, Lil Poison -- who has given several lessons a month since late last year, fitting the classes in after he has done his homework. His father, also named Victor, says his son has used some of the money he earns from lessons (hourly rate: $25) to buy a hamster, named Cortana after a character in the game.
Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 9:38 AM

July 17, 2006

Evolution, Not Revolution

Robin says,

I believe the argument that Matt's McClatchy colleague Howard Weaver makes in this post can be generalized beyond the news business:

But our change will be more lasting and better constructed if we apply the time-tested lessons of evolution and eschew the flashier but less productive posture of revolution. As we apply lessons learned from the changing climate to adapt our sturdy, battle-hardened structures, we'll end up with operations that meet changed conditions without abandoning valuable lessons from our past.

He talks about punctuated equilibrium -- the theory that evolution is not the gradual, continuous process we sometimes imagine, but actually a really fast survival response to a changed environment (e.g. meteor strike, Google).

Personally I am waiting for the equilibrium of American government to get punctuated. Viva la evolution!

P.S. Howard also links to Amazon in a way I haven't seen before; it's pretty cool and probably more useful than the normal book listing page.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 2:50 PM

June 22, 2006

Summer in St. Pete

Robin says,

Poynter Summer Fellowship in effect!

Subscribe to the feed.

Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:47 AM

June 8, 2006

John Driscoll's thoughts: Sounds like not only the producers but also the consumers in the global media so... >>

The Press' New Paradigm

watergatenron.jpg

Ask any veteran reporter or editor what journalism looks (looked?) like when it was at its best, and chances are you'll get the same answer: Watergate. Our finest hour. Cynical, tough-minded, cigar-chewing editors have teared up at the sight of Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford knocking on door after door, never giving up.

Woodward and Bernstein changed the game of journalism. Exposing cover-ups became the highest calling of the press. Since the fall of Nixon, reporters have dreamed of putting their byline on the story that told you what they didn't want you to know.

But Watergate also changed America, in ways that journalism hasn't evolved to handle. In the three-and-a-half decades since Woodstein's stories first began appearing in The Washington Post, while journalists have been busy honing their ability to uncover hidden information, the world has become a place where the scarcity of info isn't the biggest problem. Its proliferation is. And by and large, journalism organizations don't have the skills or tools to sort through all the data.

Whether journalists know it or not, we've entered a new paradigm while we've been clinging to our old ideals. Like Watergate, this paradigm is founded on a national scandal. Unlike Watergate, historians will judge our performance during this scandal to be a failure, not a success.

Welcome to the age of Enron.

... Read more ....
mthompson-sig.gif
Posted June 8, 2006 at 12:14 | Comments (5) | Permasnark
File under: Journalism

June 5, 2006

Ambush in Iraq

Robin says,

WaPo journalist Nelson Hernandez, traveling with a convoy of water trucks in Iraq, gets ambushed by insurgents -- and gets it on tape. It's scary, in part because it's so chaotic and confusing. Definitely not a movie, and definitely not a video game. (Via.)

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 7:33 PM

May 24, 2006

The Stories We Tell Ourselves

Robin says,

Roy Peter Clark quotes James Carey in a remembrance on poynter.org:

"Listen: You don't feel well, so you go to see the psychiatrist. And the doctor listens to your story. And, if he's a good doctor, he's listening for the parts of the story that are making you feel sick. His job is then to help you tell a new story about yourself, especially one that will make you well. Newspapers are the same way. Journalists are telling each other stories about themselves that are making them sick. So the remedy is to tell a new story about journalism that will help make journalism healthy again."
Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:47 PM

May 15, 2006

Facebook Was Before My Time, Too

Robin says,

Holovaty rocks Missouri's j-school commencement! As you know, I am a huge fan of both Adrian and commencement speeches, so this is pretty much an excellent way to start the week.

Nice shout-out to the PR-flacks-to-be in the audience, too.

Comments (5) | Permasnark | Posted: 7:00 AM

May 12, 2006

Public Editor #2

Matt says,

I agree with Jack Shafer, the new NYT public editor puts the lame in Calame. (BuzzMachinetic.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:02 PM

May 4, 2006

Good Point

Matt says,

News sites have been all abuzz about the agreement by soft-drink distributors to pull fizzy lifting drinks out of schools. The AP article about this draws a nice observation from Fine Young Journalist:

Four reporters worked on the story. Six people are quoted, all of whom are either happy observers or proud of themselves. ... A very significant change in behaviour is about to be imposed on students. Yet nobody appears to have talked to a kid, or anybody who works in a school. One of the four journalists could have located a student council president or student newspaper editor or somebody.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 9:54 AM

May 1, 2006

The Outlaw Ombud

Matt says,

I have big love for the fact that Dan Okrent's book is titled "Public Editor #1":

I didn’t mention this in the book, but when I had my troubles with [business reporter David Cay] Johnston, one of the senior editors said to me, “There are three things you must understand about Johnston: He’s a Pulitzer Prize winner, he’s a unique talent, and he’s an asshole.” I’m convinced that at least two of those are correct.
Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:50 AM

April 28, 2006

End-of-Week Notes

Matt says,

  • Oh my God! They killed Nnenna! Bastards!
  • Chris Daughtry's performance of "Have You Ever Really Loved a Woman" on American Idol this week was incredible. It a) made me not hate that song, and b) made me push Chris to the top of my favorites list, even ahead of my beloved Paris.
  • Check it: Journerdism.com, from '05 Poynter summer fellow Will Sullivan.
  • So you wanna blog? LaFry breaks it down.
  • Why didn't anyone tell me Newsvine CEO Mike Davidson's blog is really awesome?
Comments (3) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:51 PM

April 26, 2006

Someone on the Scene

Robin says,

Quite unintentionally, Ted Koppel explains the logic of citizen journalism:

If something happens in [a foreign country], I heard a former network news president say other day, we can always jet someone in. That is a profoundly telling statement. Instead of investing in someone on the scene who is familiar with the political and cultural landscape, who can give us all a sense of what's going to happen, and who can provide us with a sense of context when it does, news is being re-defined as "that which has happened most recently" and which may pique the interest of a particular demographic group.

I'm talking CJ-of-the-far-future, of course. We're not there yet, not by a long shot.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:33 PM

April 22, 2006

Broadcast News

Matt says,

Horrible segues, with anchorman Clive Rutledge:

"... Experts say speed dating's popularity continues to rise. After seeing that clip featuring the hottie in the halter-top, something else is rising, too, heh-heh, if you catch my drift—that's right: interest rates. Today the Federal Reserve recommended they be upped by half a percent."

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:28 AM

April 21, 2006

I Think I Dig This

Matt says,

Philips Electronics bought the first page of Time and four other magazines (space usually reserved for ads) and will put the mags' table of contents there. Taking off the journalistic umbrage hat for a moment, purely as a reader, I would love this. And the whole Philips "Simplicity" campaign is kind of genius.

Comments (4) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:13 AM

April 5, 2006

Blood and Treasure Just Blood

Robin says,

God. The LAT series by David Zucchino and Rick Loomis on battlefield medicine in Iraq (part 1, part 2, part 3) is riveting.

It's a revealing exercise to first read the articles and then watch the Flash features (part 1, part 2, part 3).

There's just sooo much wiggle room in prose -- even smart, sharp prose. More than enough for you to fill in some blanks and imagine the characters as you want them to be. Images and sounds are different; there's still wiggle room, of course, but not nearly as much.

What's interesting, though, is that wiggle room isn't always a bad thing: I found myself connecting with the wounded soldiers a lot more in the written stories. The other-ness of their gruesome injuries and their accents in the Flash pieces only made them seem more distant.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 4:40 PM

Bride of RomenRSSko

Matt says,

If you've been following my efforts to scrape together an RSS feed for the Romenesko sidebar, you might have thought I'd have either given up, learned regular expressions, or convinced Robin it was every bit as cool as Charlie Rose. Since the Wotzwot RSS tool I'd been using to make the feed introduced a couple ridiculous measures to prevent folks from ever using it, I've been without my Romenesko link-loggy goodness.

But now I've found another, much better tool for scraping together feeds. The new Romenesko sidebar feed is not only much more functional, but it also has a URL that makes sense.

Comments (5) | Permasnark | Posted: 3:36 PM

April 2, 2006

Go Gray Lady Go

Robin says,

Scope the hott NYT.com redesign. Very clean, in no way trendy.

I'm curious to see what they do with the section currently used to promo the new design; it's a pretty excellent piece of screen real estate.

New favorite page.

Not sold on NYT video yet. Though I did watch three "Vows" segments last weekend. Um.

I am not sure I fully understand the import of Times Topics but it bodes well. News building upon itself to construct an ever-more-useful framework, vs. flapping silently away into the ether every morning... I vote yes.

Also: The promise fulfilled!

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 8:43 PM

March 27, 2006

Michael Pollan and the Modern Hunt

Robin says,

Absolutely great story about hunting and a "first-person feast" by Michael Pollan in the NYT Mag. (But of course we love MP here at the 'Market.)

Comments (6) | Permasnark | Posted: 12:27 AM

March 12, 2006

State of the News Media 2006

Robin says,

Best-yet journalism biz infoporn.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 11:31 PM

March 10, 2006

What Is Journalism?

Matt says,

A post on MicroPersuasion this morning reminded me of something I ran across a few months ago I thought was amusing and revealing. It's the definition of "journalism," from the 2000 American Heritage Dictionary:

1. The collecting, writing, editing, and presenting of news or news articles in newspapers and magazines and in radio and television broadcasts.
2. Material written for publication in a newspaper or magazine or for broadcast.
3. The style of writing characteristic of material in newspapers and magazines, consisting of direct presentation of facts or occurrences with little attempt at analysis or interpretation.
4. Newspapers and magazines.
5. An academic course training students in journalism.
6. Written material of current interest or wide popular appeal.

Comments (2) | Permasnark | Posted: 7:48 AM

March 9, 2006

Hype-itorial

Matt says,

Bah. Don't believe Joe Strupp. The South Dakota Argus Leader's "brave" resurrection of the wikitorial isn't a wiki at all. It's a plain old blog that allows moderated comments.

Comments (1) | Permasnark | Posted: 7:40 AM

March 2, 2006

Le Média Citoyen

Robin says,

AgoraVox is a French citizen journalism site. It at least has the appearance of being somewhat hoppin'. There's also a newer English version. Related: I'm still not as jazzed about Newsvine as I feel like I ought to be.

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 5:58 PM

February 23, 2006

Look Out, Blogosphere

Matt says,

Malcolm Gladwell has a blog. I am already edified. (MetaFilterrific.)

Comments (0) | Permasnark | Posted: 10:17 PM
Tim's thoughts: I was thinking more of the various times in my life when my parents asked me if I was taking drug... >>

MySpace ph34r

Columbine-area teen in custody after MySpace.com posting showing guns. Best headline ever. It condenses almost all the over-hyped media youth-bashing of the last five years into one succinct line. If only the copy editor had thrown in some stuf