The murmur of the snarkmatrix…

Jennifer § Two songs from The Muppet Movie / 2021-02-12 15:53:34
A few notes on daily blogging § Stock and flow / 2017-11-20 19:52:47
El Stock y Flujo de nuestro negocio. – redmasiva § Stock and flow / 2017-03-27 17:35:13
Meet the Attendees – edcampoc § The generative web event / 2017-02-27 10:18:17
Does Your Digital Business Support a Lifestyle You Love? § Stock and flow / 2017-02-09 18:15:22
Daniel § Stock and flow / 2017-02-06 23:47:51
Kanye West, media cyborg – MacDara Conroy § Kanye West, media cyborg / 2017-01-18 10:53:08
Inventing a game – MacDara Conroy § Inventing a game / 2017-01-18 10:52:33
Losing my religion | Mathew Lowry § Stock and flow / 2016-07-11 08:26:59
Facebook is wrong, text is deathless – Sitegreek !nfotech § Towards A Theory of Secondary Literacy / 2016-06-20 16:42:52

links for 2006-06-30
 / 

Comments

The Giantess Pinocchia
 / 

I agree with the Gadgetopia folks, this giant marionette is way too creepy.

2 comments

links for 2006-06-28
 / 

Comments

links for 2006-06-27
 / 

2 comments

Reviews of the New Slate.com
 / 

From across the Web:

“An unmitigated disaster.”

“Boo, Slate. Boo.”

“It’s hideous. Yuck.”

“I think it’s awful.”

“We hate it, but, then again, we initially hated the last makeover too…”

“Oy.”

Yeah, pretty much sums it up for me. (By the way, I didn’t cherry-pick; those are the top mentions on Technorati right now.) Generally, I don’t mind redesigns; I think I’m usually pretty good about detaching from my nostalgia for familiar layouts. But the new Slate aches my kidneys. It is so bad.

5 comments

Massively Multimaker …
 / 

Chris Bateman at Only a Game continues to express cool ideas about games. And they remind me I have a post buried somewhere in my head about Inform 7.

4 comments

links for 2006-06-21
 / 

Comments

links for 2006-06-19
 / 

One comment

Open Peer Review
 / 

Chris Anderson links to an interesting experiment:

The scientific journal Nature is conducting a fascinating experiment in “open peer review”, which it describes this way:

In Nature’s peer review trial, lasting for three months, authors can choose to have their submissions posted on a preprint server for open comments, in parallel with the conventional peer review process. Anyone in the field may then post comments, provided they are prepared to identify themselves. Once the usual confidential peer review process is complete, the public ‘open peer review’ process will be closed. Nature will report on the results after the trial period is over.

One comment

Amnesty Int'l Ad Campaign
 / 

It’s not happening here, but it’s happening now. (Unmediated.)

One comment