<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kind of screwed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2011/7104/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/7104</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/7104/comment-page-1#comment-33929</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=7104#comment-33929</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I missed this earlier, but yeah, you&#039;re quire right. I think I was trying to make it about &quot;8 bit&quot; because that&#039;s more interesting to me :)

Interestingly, Techdirt&#039;s Mike Masnick today claimed something interesting: that all photography is a transformation of an original something into a work of art. You might even say that transformation of a scene into a still image is what makes it art. Seemed an interesting way to think about things: art is always-already &#039;there&#039; - technology/techne unconceal it. Link here:

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110625/01030814852/if-jay-maisels-photograph-is-original-artwork-then-so-is-pixelated-cover-kind-bloop.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I missed this earlier, but yeah, you’re quire right. I think I was trying to make it about “8 bit” because that’s more interesting to me :)</p>
<p>Interestingly, Techdirt’s Mike Masnick today claimed something interesting: that all photography is a transformation of an original something into a work of art. You might even say that transformation of a scene into a still image is what makes it art. Seemed an interesting way to think about things: art is always-already ‘there’ — technology/techne unconceal it. Link here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110625/01030814852/if-jay-maisels-photograph-is-original-artwork-then-so-is-pixelated-cover-kind-bloop.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110625/01030814852/if-jay-maisels-photograph-is-original-artwork-then-so-is-pixelated-cover-kind-bloop.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Sloan</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/7104/comment-page-1#comment-33451</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Sloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=7104#comment-33451</guid>
		<description>Hmm, but look at the other really high-profile case recently: Shepard Fairey&#039;s Obama poster. To me, that&#039;s just as clear—like, you&#039;ve got to me kidding me, that&#039;s a legit copyright claim?—but he was in pretty hot water, too. Granted, we&#039;ll never know how that case would have turned out b/c Fairey kinda ruined his own position, and ended up settling... but still. Same core claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, but look at the other really high-profile case recently: Shepard Fairey’s Obama poster. To me, that’s just as clear—like, you’ve got to me kidding me, that’s a legit copyright claim?—but he was in pretty hot water, too. Granted, we’ll never know how that case would have turned out b/c Fairey kinda ruined his own position, and ended up settling… but still. Same core claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/7104/comment-page-1#comment-33190</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=7104#comment-33190</guid>
		<description>So, in a way, beyond the horrible suckage of this, the case seemed to hinge on whether or not the 8-bit aesthetic represents something transformative or its simply derivative. 

I wonder if this would have gone differently if &quot;8-bit&quot; were more established or &#039;respected&#039; within the mainstream. It seems so off to me. What possible threat to the original or the photographer did this pixellated version represent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in a way, beyond the horrible suckage of this, the case seemed to hinge on whether or not the 8-bit aesthetic represents something transformative or its simply derivative. </p>
<p>I wonder if this would have gone differently if “8-bit” were more established or ‘respected’ within the mainstream. It seems so off to me. What possible threat to the original or the photographer did this pixellated version represent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
