<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed the beast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6918/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6918</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6918/comment-page-1#comment-30597</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=6918#comment-30597</guid>
		<description>I did not know Kafka had a blog.

Not only is that awesome, it gives me the perfect excuse to link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n05/judith-butler/who-owns-kafka&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this LRB article&lt;/a&gt; on Kafka and his unpublished manuscripts: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Eva and Ruth, would claim that no one needs to inventory the materials and that the value of the manuscripts should be determined by their weight – quite literally, by what they weigh. As one of the attorneys representing Hoffe’s estate explained: ‘If we get an agreement, the material will be offered for sale as a single entity, in one package. It will be sold by weight … They’ll say: “There’s a kilogram of papers here, the highest bidder will be able to approach and see what’s there.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is a beautiful letter from Martin Jenkins at the end suggesting that putting Kafka&#039;s unpublished work online is the best way to honour his will. It makes most sense after reading the essay itself though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not know Kafka had a blog.</p>
<p>Not only is that awesome, it gives me the perfect excuse to link to <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n05/judith-butler/who-owns-kafka" rel="nofollow">this LRB article</a> on Kafka and his unpublished manuscripts: </p>
<blockquote><p>Eva and Ruth, would claim that no one needs to inventory the materials and that the value of the manuscripts should be determined by their weight – quite literally, by what they weigh. As one of the attorneys representing Hoffe’s estate explained: ‘If we get an agreement, the material will be offered for sale as a single entity, in one package. It will be sold by weight … They’ll say: “There’s a kilogram of papers here, the highest bidder will be able to approach and see what’s there.”</p></blockquote>
<p>There is a beautiful letter from Martin Jenkins at the end suggesting that putting Kafka’s unpublished work online is the best way to honour his will. It makes most sense after reading the essay itself though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Carmody</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6918/comment-page-1#comment-30322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Carmody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=6918#comment-30322</guid>
		<description>Again, I am not the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anvari.org/fortune/The_Simpsons/29771_that-simpson-he-thinks-hes-the-pope-of-chili-town.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pope of chili town&lt;/a&gt;, but I would say absolutely, yes. 

Also a big fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://metameat.net/kafka/index.php?en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The diaries of Franz Kafka, 1910-1923&lt;/a&gt;. Another interesting experiment is From Marshall and Me, which juxtaposes Marshall McLuhan excerpts with reflections by the author -- usually written at the same approximate age McLuhan was when he made X comment. Not unlike the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/179472/Book-Club-for-Life&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Book Club for Life&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I am not the <a href="http://www.anvari.org/fortune/The_Simpsons/29771_that-simpson-he-thinks-hes-the-pope-of-chili-town.html" rel="nofollow">pope of chili town</a>, but I would say absolutely, yes. </p>
<p>Also a big fan of <a href="http://metameat.net/kafka/index.php?en" rel="nofollow">The diaries of Franz Kafka, 1910–1923</a>. Another interesting experiment is From Marshall and Me, which juxtaposes Marshall McLuhan excerpts with reflections by the author — usually written at the same approximate age McLuhan was when he made X comment. Not unlike the <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/179472/Book-Club-for-Life" rel="nofollow">Book Club for Life</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6918/comment-page-1#comment-30147</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=6918#comment-30147</guid>
		<description>Do the &lt;a href=&quot;http://orwelldiaries.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Orwell Diaries&lt;/a&gt; count as paleoblogging, or were they already too well known? Still lovely to see online, though I was enough of an Orwell nut I read them in print form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the <a href="http://orwelldiaries.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Orwell Diaries</a> count as paleoblogging, or were they already too well known? Still lovely to see online, though I was enough of an Orwell nut I read them in print form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

