<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snark Couture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2010/6058/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/6058</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/6058/comment-page-1#comment-13013</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=6058#comment-13013</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the thing about Unrefinery: the writing is borderline illiterate, the photography looks like it was taken with a broken camera, and if you like that sort of humour you are probably a terrible person.

Peace Out,
Thomas
Editor, Unrefinery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the thing about Unrefinery: the writing is borderline illiterate, the photography looks like it was taken with a broken camera, and if you like that sort of humour you are probably a terrible person.</p>
<p>Peace Out,<br />
Thomas<br />
Editor, Unrefinery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saheli</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/6058/comment-page-1#comment-12963</link>
		<dc:creator>Saheli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=6058#comment-12963</guid>
		<description>You will totally rock that blazer, especially in caviar. 

There&#039;s something about the eminent practicality of men&#039;s fashion magazines--even Esquire--that I long for in women&#039;s fashion magazines. Men&#039;s fashion magazines actually talk about cut and fabric, honing in on detail and functionality that makes me feel like I could actually glean some useful take away info despite being totally excluded from the price brackets. Women&#039;s fashion magazines just leave me feeling poor, chubby, and stuck in an unglamorous workplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will totally rock that blazer, especially in caviar. </p>
<p>There’s something about the eminent practicality of men’s fashion magazines–even Esquire–that I long for in women’s fashion magazines. Men’s fashion magazines actually talk about cut and fabric, honing in on detail and functionality that makes me feel like I could actually glean some useful take away info despite being totally excluded from the price brackets. Women’s fashion magazines just leave me feeling poor, chubby, and stuck in an unglamorous workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

