<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new utility belt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now is the time for experiments &#171; Solipsistic Pop</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/comment-page-1#comment-11166</link>
		<dc:creator>Now is the time for experiments &#171; Solipsistic Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=5462#comment-11166</guid>
		<description>[...] when meta-data gets used to make physical Christmas decorations, or&#8230; well, I could go on and on and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] when meta-data gets used to make physical Christmas decorations, or… well, I could go on and on and […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/comment-page-1#comment-10184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=5462#comment-10184</guid>
		<description>I wonder where the New Liberal Arts fit in with the new utility belt. Think about it: attention economics, brevity, collaboration/creativity, iteration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder where the New Liberal Arts fit in with the new utility belt. Think about it: attention economics, brevity, collaboration/creativity, iteration…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/comment-page-1#comment-10168</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=5462#comment-10168</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s definitely worth emphasizing Saheli&#039;s point that this worked for Robin because he&#039;s built up a Twitter community that was ready and waiting to take on such a project.

Several months ago I put out a call on Twitter looking for people to read a working draft of my new one-act play &lt;i&gt;Of People and Not Things&lt;/i&gt;.  I got responses from two interested people and no actual feedback.  

Of course at the time I had a total of maybe 80 twitter followers compared to Robin&#039;s ~200,000.  So the pool from which I was trying to draw was quite small. 

In my cadre of readers contacted via e-mail, however, I got detailed notes from say 6 of the 9 people that I sent various versions of the script over the course of the piece&#039;s gestation.  

And then last November I held a workshop performance/dinner party.  It was a great time (living room theatre totally needs to make a comeback) and I got really valuable feedback from another 20 people.  

I would love to make use of on-line real time feedback in my writing, but I think that first I would need to spend a fair amount of time dedicated to building a digital audience ready and waiting for the call.  And, unfortunately, time is my most limited commodity these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s definitely worth emphasizing Saheli’s point that this worked for Robin because he’s built up a Twitter community that was ready and waiting to take on such a project.</p>
<p>Several months ago I put out a call on Twitter looking for people to read a working draft of my new one-act play <i>Of People and Not Things</i>.  I got responses from two interested people and no actual feedback.  </p>
<p>Of course at the time I had a total of maybe 80 twitter followers compared to Robin’s ~200,000.  So the pool from which I was trying to draw was quite small. </p>
<p>In my cadre of readers contacted via e-mail, however, I got detailed notes from say 6 of the 9 people that I sent various versions of the script over the course of the piece’s gestation.  </p>
<p>And then last November I held a workshop performance/dinner party.  It was a great time (living room theatre totally needs to make a comeback) and I got really valuable feedback from another 20 people.  </p>
<p>I would love to make use of on-line real time feedback in my writing, but I think that first I would need to spend a fair amount of time dedicated to building a digital audience ready and waiting for the call.  And, unfortunately, time is my most limited commodity these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saheli</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/comment-page-1#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator>Saheli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=5462#comment-10167</guid>
		<description>I think this is a really smart analysis and helps abstract away the learned principles away from the current form of the utility belt into something more durable, like Jane&#039;s slideshow. Twitter worked well for Robin, though, because he has built a Twitter community--and had specifically primed it to be excited about #shelldrake. I think there are other communities and tasks where a different platform might be better.

The part I really like about Amanda&#039;s analysis, though, is the emphasis on &quot;once there’s work to be done. &quot; Robin, I thought you did an amazingly good job of chunking the work into manageable bits. When you put out the initial call for photoshop people I was very hesitant and only signed on because it seemed like you weren&#039;t getting people to sign on. My photoshop skills are &lt;i&gt;terrible&lt;/i&gt; in the grand scheme of things. But when you sent out the call for the Seal of Oberon, I was like, &quot;okay, that I can do quickly, without totally disrupting my day, and it will be fun.&quot; (I was so much more motivated once I saw Team Lead, of course.)

Taking a huge project and breaking it into doable pieces and coming up with a way to get the right people doing the right pieces is of course &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; management problem of the Holocene epoch, but it&#039;s rare for someone to have so much fun coming up with the sauce for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a really smart analysis and helps abstract away the learned principles away from the current form of the utility belt into something more durable, like Jane’s slideshow. Twitter worked well for Robin, though, because he has built a Twitter community–and had specifically primed it to be excited about #shelldrake. I think there are other communities and tasks where a different platform might be better.</p>
<p>The part I really like about Amanda’s analysis, though, is the emphasis on “once there’s work to be done. ” Robin, I thought you did an amazingly good job of chunking the work into manageable bits. When you put out the initial call for photoshop people I was very hesitant and only signed on because it seemed like you weren’t getting people to sign on. My photoshop skills are <i>terrible</i> in the grand scheme of things. But when you sent out the call for the Seal of Oberon, I was like, “okay, that I can do quickly, without totally disrupting my day, and it will be fun.” (I was so much more motivated once I saw Team Lead, of course.)</p>
<p>Taking a huge project and breaking it into doable pieces and coming up with a way to get the right people doing the right pieces is of course <i>the</i> management problem of the Holocene epoch, but it’s rare for someone to have so much fun coming up with the sauce for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/5462/comment-page-1#comment-10153</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=5462#comment-10153</guid>
		<description>A real-time call-out always works better. That doesn&#039;t mean that Twitter is better than e-mail, though. What you&#039;re pointing to is standing operating practice of online organizers, which is that you ask people to participate once there&#039;s work to be done. Yes, some people who participate may have signed up in advance but you&#039;re always better off recruiting around a task that&#039;s ready to be done. Why? Well, you&#039;re enabling better self-selection -- people know what you&#039;re looking for, realize they have some time now, etc. Interestingly enough, my experience has been that an e-mail announcing the start of a project performs better than Twitter. Ok, back to reading the rest of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real-time call-out always works better. That doesn’t mean that Twitter is better than e-mail, though. What you’re pointing to is standing operating practice of online organizers, which is that you ask people to participate once there’s work to be done. Yes, some people who participate may have signed up in advance but you’re always better off recruiting around a task that’s ready to be done. Why? Well, you’re enabling better self-selection — people know what you’re looking for, realize they have some time now, etc. Interestingly enough, my experience has been that an e-mail announcing the start of a project performs better than Twitter. Ok, back to reading the rest of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
