The view from a different discipline

In an utter and absolute twist, Nico Muhly waxes rhap­sodic about a totally sci-fi notion:

Often­times, I wish I had some­body who would just rush into my stu­dio and say, here’s the deal with this piece: this part is awe­some, and these two bars have to go. Or “those two bars are irrel­e­vant.” I’ve writ­ten at length about this prob­lem before; in the other Arts, both applied and oth­er­wise, there are out­side forces to tem­per the artist. Visual artists are restricted by the size of their can­vas or the space their art will inhabit. Writ­ers have edi­tors! Can you imag­ine, com­posers, if you had an editor? 

And what I love is the way he defines an edi­tor in the very next line…

Some­body you love & hate & trust & mis­trust who has access to your music at any juncture?

…which sounds rather Jekyll-and-Hyde-ish, doesn’t it? Almost like some other ver­sion of your­self that you swoon and trans­form into: “Huh, what? Where am I? What is this? Who wrote this? I… wait… my god, this is crap!” Some other ver­sion of your­self with one dif­fer­ence, one impos­si­ble advan­tage: fresh eyes.

One Response

    Greg says:

    >Can you imag­ine, com­posers, if you had an editor? 

    Isn’t that what really good pro­duc­ers do for musi­cians? You know, not the autotuning-coal-into-diamonds type of pro­duc­ers (they’re more like direc­tors or writ­ers them­selves), but peo­ple such as Nigel Godrich or Rick Rubin.

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply