<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The antiphilatelist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2010/4810/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/4810</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Carmody</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2010/4810/comment-page-1#comment-8274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Carmody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkmarket.com/?p=4810#comment-8274</guid>
		<description>I got really into file marks when I was working on office technology; stamp cancellations would be a special case of these, notarization stamps might be another. Internal office marks sometimes were just abbreviations, meaning something like &quot;OK,&quot; &quot;return,&quot; &quot;copy before sending,&quot; &quot;burn this copy,&quot; &quot;send.&quot; 

Cornelia Vismann argues that these marks are like little speech acts; they don&#039;t just record that something has been done, they actually effect that thing into being. With documents in particular, they trigger all sorts of algorithms -- think of the mailroom scenes in &lt;em&gt;The Hudsucker Proxy&lt;/em&gt;. Actors that become the evidence of action and its legitimacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got really into file marks when I was working on office technology; stamp cancellations would be a special case of these, notarization stamps might be another. Internal office marks sometimes were just abbreviations, meaning something like “OK,” “return,” “copy before sending,” “burn this copy,” “send.” </p>
<p>Cornelia Vismann argues that these marks are like little speech acts; they don’t just record that something has been done, they actually effect that thing into being. With documents in particular, they trigger all sorts of algorithms — think of the mailroom scenes in <em>The Hudsucker Proxy</em>. Actors that become the evidence of action and its legitimacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

