I love paper so much I should marry it

We’ve fea­tured exam­ples of paper­craft here before, but Web­de­signer Depot just posted “100 Extra­or­di­nary Exam­ples of Paper Art” that blew my mind. Here are a few choice exam­ples, with commentary.

First are two by Peter Calle­sen, who gets the most expo­sure on the WD page. Not all of his pieces make use of neg­a­tive space in this way, but I liked these the best:

Peter Callesen

Peter Calle­sen

The sec­ond is more hopeful:

http://www.petercallesen.com/

http://www.petercallesen.com/

This is by Simon Schu­bert, who some­how gen­er­ates an MC Escher effect even though there are no actual visual para­doxes in his images. The brain just goes there anyways.

Simon Schubert

Simon Schu­bert

Bryan Dettmer calls these “Book Autop­sies.” The grand­fa­ther of these kind of dada-cut-up-meets-book-art is Tom Phillips’s A Humu­ment, but Dettmer’s got his own sculp­tural, Joseph Cornell-ish style:

Bryan Dettmer, Book Autopsies

Bryan Dettmer, Book Autopsies

I won­der what tools Bovey Lee uses to make these — an exacto-knife? A scalpel? A laser? The word I keep return­ing to is fil­i­gree:

http://www.boveylee.com/

http://www.boveylee.com/

Ingrid Sil­i­akus threads the nee­dle here — her sculp­tures sug­gest futur­ism, but also car­toons and pop-up books. I like her pieces above all for their explo­ration of depth — you need just the right kind of pho­to­graphic angle and light­ing to gain a sense of their dimen­sion­al­ity:

http://ingrid-siliakus.exto.org/

http://ingrid-siliakus.exto.org/

Which offers some lessons on both paper­craft and (per­haps) the future of paper. First: paper art isn’t just the craft­ing of these objects; it’s their stag­ing, fram­ing, light­ing, and above all their pho­tog­ra­phy. Black-and-white art, in par­tic­u­lar (which I grav­i­tate towards) is par­tic­u­larly sen­si­tive to the effects of light, shadow, and dif­fer­ences from one angle to the next.

Last, vir­tu­ally all of these pieces take advan­tage of the fact that a sheet of paper is a three-dimensional object pos­ing as a two-dimensional one. It flits and flut­ters between these two pos­si­bil­i­ties of shape and sur­face, flat­ness and thick­ness, which is pre­cisely what gives it all of its charm and util­ity. In a world that (set­ting aside the UI fan­tasies of Iron Man, Bones, and Avatar and the exper­i­ments of Microsoft) is going to be stuck with two-dimensional dig­i­tal inter­faces for a long time, this most under­uti­lized aspect of paper takes on a new significance.

I hope kids, espe­cially, take notice of these pos­si­bil­i­ties. A rebel­lious mes­sage is an air­plane; a love note is a rhyming game…

via Jan­neke Adema (@openreflections)

2 Responses

    Robin Sloan says:

    It just reg­is­tered that WD’s post is “100 extra­or­di­nary exam­ples.” One HUNDRED. That’s so silly! I don’t like this new trend towards mega-lists. Basi­cally it becomes like “here is a list of 100 things.”

    Which, of course, is why the Car­mody Cura­tion Layer is invaluable!

    Saheli says:

    Have you guys seen Between the Folds? You should. I’m think­ing of buy­ing it–maybe I’ll have a bay area movie night.

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply