The feeds, the blogs, the tweets, the years

You have no doubt seen the Bygone Bureau’s excel­lent round-up of the best new blogs of 2009 with con­tri­bu­tions from every­one Snark­mar­ket admires. Three notes:

First: All hail Joanne McNeil and her 749 feeds. This is, by the way, the cor­rect use of Google Reader. It’s not an email inbox… it’s baleen.

Sec­ond: I like Andy’s men­tion of Off­world, because it’s a video game blog that did what the very best jour­nal­ism does: not just track an exist­ing con­ver­sa­tion but start a whole new one. Offworld’s focus on indie games and crazy ludol­ogy is as much a sus­tained argu­ment as it is a chronicle.

Third: My favorite new blog of 2009 is… Twit­ter. It’s remark­able how much it’s changed this year—for me, at least. It went from being a pleas­antly ran­dom feed of ban­ter to, really, the locus of my inter­net life. When I open a browser, I fire up Twit­ter in the first tab—even before Gmail. Wow!

9 Responses

    Nav says:

    First: Baleen! I love it! Nine year-old me (who loved whales) would be even more thrilled. But I’m also a bit in shock. I’m con­stantly hov­er­ing at 250 and it always threat­ens to drown me. There’s some skill or approach that I’m miss­ing. I won­der if Joanne has writ­ten any­thing on how she does it in a man­ner that works for her. 

    Sec­ond: Yes! Wasn’t some­one recently talk­ing about how good crit­i­cism pro­duces its field? That seri­ous film crit­ics invented film as a dis­ci­pline because they not only stud­ied it dili­gently, but approached film ‘as film’? 

    Third: It is remark­able how much it has changed. What I’ve been enjoy­ing this year is the sense of the local that it pro­duces — this weird, shim­mer­ing (invis­i­ble) vision of the city I live in that hov­ers in my imag­i­na­tion as I walk around. In a way, it has become the place I go to see what’s going on in the world. The cra­zier part? I actu­ally “know” maybe 3 or 4 peo­ple on it. The rest are all blog­ger friends or peo­ple who, at least now, no longer fit the term ‘total strangers’.

    Tim Maly says:

    I have writ­ten and scrapped posts about tam­ing the fire­hose so many times. Because I frankly haven’t tamed it. I just turned off read counts and every now and then close my eyes and mark every­thing ‘read’.

    […] the list is full of good stuff and, like Robin, I love the inclu­sion of Off­world. Go read! It’s a great resource, but it’s also a […]

    echan says:

    The place that Google Reader has in my Inter­net uni­verse is the place that Twit­ter held 18 months ago; it’s some­thing that could become more use­ful, if I could get a lot of friends to join (or in the case of Google Reader to share). I really enjoy dis­cov­er­ing ephemera through GReader shar­ing, and when I review my per­sonal aggre­gated feed on my iPhone, all the news, trash, gos­sip, design pr0n, bougie com­men­tary is swilled together as one strong ciop­pino of information.

    As for Twit­ter, it can set sure set off synap­ti­cal fires.

    -@EC

    Robin Sloan says:

    I really do think that embrac­ing “mark all as read” is the key. My favorite advice is William Gibson’s. It was at a read­ing here in SF and if I remem­ber cor­rectly he was specif­i­cally talk­ing about RSS readers:

    He said it’s like dip­ping a fin­ger into the zeit­geist. It this river roar­ing past, and you’re just tak­ing its tem­per­a­ture. The rea­son to go for scale—to sub­scribe to 700 feeds, not just 70—is to increase the chance of weird com­bi­na­tions, of unex­pected col­li­sions that reveal some­thing new & inter­est­ing. To pile it all into your brain and wait for inter­est­ing things to hap­pen, not nec­es­sar­ily on the con­scious level! War­ren Ellis talks about this too: about throw­ing it all in the brain-pot and let­ting mys­te­ri­ous things happen.

    Like EC says: every­thing mixed together in one strong cioppino!

    My ques­tion is: what *are* those 700 feeds? I have 147 feeds cur­rently, but 30 of them are Hulu or PBS TV show feeds, so really, 117 feeds, and I can get through all of them in one day rather quickly. So to “dip my fin­ger into the zeit­geist,” where should I start? I already thought my 100+ feeds was every­thing I could pos­si­bly be inter­ested in. 

    Also, do you guys use key­board short­cuts? You know, “j” for next, “k” for pre­vi­ous? Just keep tap­ping them quickly while skim­ming the head­lines, then press “v” to open those that you wanna read later in a tab

    […] at Snark­mar­ket com­mented: [William Gib­son] said it’s like dip­ping a fin­ger into the zeit­geist. It this […]

    Matt Katz says:

    I sub­scribe to a crapload of feeds as well, but I still have the fear, the fear of miss­ing anything. 

    I stopped pay­ing much atten­tion to twit­ter when I found identi.ca. It’s still smaller and more inti­mate, and it is archi­tected RIGHT. What you get is a beau­ti­ful free web of con­ver­sa­tions instead of a big focal hub.

    Sure twit­ter is eas­ier, but it is flawed just like AOL or Com­puServe.
    Oh, how quickly they for­get the twit­poca­lypse…
    http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/twitpocalypse/ — yrs trly is quoted…

    Matt Katz says:

    Also — if you want to share your sub­scrip­tions look in greader for the “Export OPML” option.

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply