Your local stationers’ shop

There are a few ways in which the future of book­stores will resem­ble the past. Here’s one you might not know about: The money in book­stores has never been in sell­ing books.

Don’t believe me? Read The Auto­bi­og­ra­phy of Ben­jamin Franklin. Franklin was a printer, a pub­lisher, a news­pa­per­man, a book­seller, and of course an author, sci­en­tist, inven­tor, and über-citizen. Do you know where he made his money? His sta­tionery shop. He sold book­plates, printed invi­ta­tions, let­ter­head, and plain writ­ing paper. This was always the high-margin AND high-volume end of his busi­ness. Franklin’s news­pa­pers, pam­phlets, and books were a labor of love, patri­o­tism, and intel­lec­tual over­flow, but func­tion­ally, they were loss leaders. 

And really, this is still the way book­stores work. Yes, we go in to browse, be com­forted by, and per­haps even pur­chase books — but really, the big-ticket items are greet­ing cards, blank books, cal­en­dars, wrap­ping paper, col­lege sweat­shirts, candy, cof­fee. That, at least, is where the money is. Book­sellers are still pri­mar­ily deal­ers in 1) paper and 2) social goods — books are merely the low-profit-but-high-prestige emblem of that intersection.

Of course, now big-box retail­ers are using books as loss lead­ers in a very dif­fer­ent way — sell­ing hot books below WHOLESALE in the hope of get­ting you in the store to buy a big-screen TV. It’s not just books and media, but also gro­ceries, tube socks, and pre­scrip­tion drugs. The Tar­gets, Wal-Marts, and Best Buys of the world arguably have just taken the sta­tion­ers’ model to par­o­dic heights. And since there wasn’t exactly an inde­pen­dent tube-sock mar­ket before, the peo­ple who stand the most to lose from this are book­sellers. Book­sellers who, again, are already sell­ing books as loss lead­ers to get peo­ple into the store to buy their high-margin items. You can be more char­i­ta­ble and say that the sale of the high-margin items sub­si­dizes the sale of the books, which is what sell­ers and read­ers REALLY care about. But func­tion­ally, it’s the same model. It’s just that when it comes to high-margin goods, a photo album sim­ply can’t beat a Blu-Ray player — so Wal-Mart can “sub­si­dize” their book sales a lot more than the book­sellers can.

This is the eco­nomic sub­strate of the Amer­i­can Book­sellers’ Association’s open let­ter to the Jus­tice Depart­ment. Here’s the ide­o­log­i­cal payload:

For our members-locally owned, inde­pen­dent bookstores-the effect will be dev­as­tat­ing. There is sim­ply no way for ABA mem­bers to com­pete. The net result will be the clos­ing of many inde­pen­dent book­stores, and a con­cen­tra­tion of power in the book indus­try in very few hands. Bill Petro­celli, owner of Book Pas­sage in Corte Madera, Cal­i­for­nia, an ABA mem­ber, was also quoted in the New York Times:

You have a choke point where mil­lions of writ­ers are try­ing to reach mil­lions of read­ers. But if it all has to go through a nar­row fun­nel where there are only four or five buy­ers decid­ing what’s going to get pub­lished, the busi­ness is in trouble.”

We would find these prac­tices ques­tion­able were they tak­ing place in the mar­ket for wid­gets. That they are tak­ing place in the mar­ket for books is cat­a­strophic. If left unchecked, these preda­tory pric­ing poli­cies will dev­as­tate not only the book indus­try, but our col­lec­tive abil­ity to main­tain a soci­ety where the widest range of ideas are always made avail­able to the pub­lic, and will allow the few remain­ing mega book­sellers to raise prices to con­sumers unchecked.

Okay. So let’s just grant all of that stuff about inde­pen­dent book­sellers — or hell, even chains like B&N or Bor­ders, so long as they pri­mar­ily sell books — being essen­tial to the func­tion­ing of a free soci­ety. I’ve got my doubts about how or why that might be true, and way too much (book­stores, news­pa­pers, the Amer­i­can auto indus­try) seems essen­tial to the func­tion­ing of a free soci­ety these days — but screw it. In the case of book­stores, I want to believe it. 

At the very least, let’s grant that book­stores are awe­some, and add a lot of value to their com­mu­ni­ties. Let’s also grant that even if the DoJ tries to keep big-boxers from sell­ing below whole­sale, they’re still going to exert a lot of price pres­sure on book­stores so long as they’re sell­ing books cheaply. We can also assume that online book­stores, too, are going to con­tinue to chip away at brick-and-mortars by offer­ing greater selec­tion at a lower price. And let’s assume — or pray — that the ABA’s request that “the loss-leader pric­ing of dig­i­tal con­tent also bears scrutiny” by the DoJ doesn’t lead to crush­ingly high price-fixing on that end. Then we need to fig­ure out a new busi­ness model that can keep local brick-and-mortar book­sellers alive.

Clay Shirky pro­poses going co-op (or at least, offer­ing some kind of NPR-style patron­age):

Reserv­able space for book clubs, writ­ers rooms, or study car­rels; mem­ber­ship with buy-back options for a second-hand book mar­ket run out of the same space; cer­tain shop­ping hours reserved for mem­bers or donors; use of vol­un­teer labor, like a food coop; spon­sor­ships from the peo­ple or busi­nesses in the neigh­bor­hood most inter­ested in the social value of the store and most inter­ested in being known as local machers.

The core idea is to appeal to that small sub­set of cus­tomers who think of book­stores as their “third place”, along­side home and work. These peo­ple care about the store’s exis­tence in phys­i­cal (and there­fore social) space; the goal would be to gen­er­ate enough rev­enue from them to make the dif­fer­ence between red and black ink, and to make the new bar­gain not just accept­able but desir­able for all par­ties. A small col­lec­tion of patron saints who helped keep a local book­store open could be cheaply smoth­ered in appre­ci­a­tion by the cul­ture they help support.

There are already exist­ing mod­els for this, like the mighty Sem­i­nary Co-Op book­store in Chicago. Barnes & Noble offers paid mem­ber­ships that trans­late into free ship­ping and dis­counted books, well worth it for high-volume pur­chasers. It seems to keep the Sem Co-Op run­ning, and prob­a­bly nets a sig­nif­i­cant profit for B&N, so there are good rea­sons to think that this pro­gram has got a shot — espe­cially if book­stores are inven­tive in how they come up with mem­ber ben­e­fits. For instance, it would be fas­ci­nat­ing to see a book­store run as a real co-op, with mem­bers actively dri­ving the direc­tion of the store. The Sem Co-Op cer­tainly gets a lot of feed­back and advice from its mem­bers (espe­cially the U of C profs), but it’s pretty far from direct democracy.

Cory Doc­torow offers a dif­fer­ent way for cus­tomers to con­tribute to the stores’ future — and it’s not unlike what Franklin offered in his sta­tion­ers’ shop:

At the Har­vard Book­store, they have some­one who spends the day mou­s­ing around on Google Book Search, look­ing for weird and cool titles in the pub­lic domain to print and shelve around the store, as sug­ges­tions for the sort of thing you might have printed for your­self. This is a purely cura­to­r­ial role, the clas­sic thing that a great retailer does, and it’s one of the most excit­ing book­store sec­tions I’ve browsed in years. And even so, there’s lots of room for improve­ment: Google Books pro­duces the bland­est, most bor­ing cov­ers for its PD books, and there’s plenty of room for stores to add value with their own cov­ers, with customer-supplied cov­ers (the gift pos­si­bil­i­ties are bot­tom­less), and so on. I can even imag­ine the profs across the street pro­duc­ing anno­tated ver­sions — say, a trea­tise on Alice in Won­der­land with repro­duc­tions of ten dif­fer­ent edi­tions’ illus­tra­tions and sell­ing them through the store’s printer and shelf-space, restor­ing the ancient bookseller/book-publisher role. 

Of course, most of the mass-produced cat­a­log will prob­a­bly end up in the print-on-demand cat­a­log some day, and stores will be able to fill those orders, too. But if you already know what book you want, why bother going to a store? (Unless you’re in too much of a hurry to wait for the mail).

On the other hand, there’s plenty of ways that a phys­i­cal store could offer added value on mass-market titles: local­ized cov­ers, signed books, high production-value gift edi­tions, a point-of-sale “donate to our neigh­bor­hood schools” kiosk that lets you print a book on the spot for a class­room that’s requested it… 

The key point seems to be that book­store patrons today are kind of like the Repub­li­can Party — almost every­one who hasn’t given up on the project alto­gether is a zealot. To stay alive, book­stores need to fos­ter their com­mu­ni­ties and har­ness that zealotry, mak­ing sure that they don’t lose a gen­er­a­tion of future zealots sim­ply because they didn’t show up. 

I like Doctorow’s for­mu­la­tion: “In that world, book­sellers become a lot more like blog­gers who spe­cial­ize in all things book­ish — wun­derkam­mer­ers who stock exactly the right book for the right peo­ple in the right neighborhood.”

Now this actu­ally loses book­stores the pure democ­racy argu­ment. It will no longer be the case that book­stores are the only places offer­ing sal­va­tio — er, I mean, books. Book­stores might not be our Catholic churches, where every­one is wel­come — but they could be our hard, thrifty Puri­tan churches, whose mem­bers go out into the world and demon­strate their sal­va­tion through their worldly works. 

5 Responses

    Robin Sloan says:

    Hmm. Hmmmm.

    First of all, I just love this line: “The key point seems to be that book­store patrons today are kind of like the Repub­li­can Party — almost every­one who hasn’t given up on the project alto­gether is a zealot.”

    Sec­ond, this would be a fun brainstorm/contest: What’s an alto­gether new vision for a book­store? I say “vision” specif­i­cally b/c I feel like I want a ren­der­ing; I want to see what it looks like. And I have a feel­ing that one key dif­fer­ence is that the major­ity of the floor space is not taken up by books anymore.

    Say there’s a small, focused selec­tion of pre-printed stuff, a) so you can browse but really b) for the color and tex­ture. The aes­thet­ics of stacked books. But most of what you buy is print-on-demand a la Doc­torow. A bank of bright POD book-machines whirring away. You get a cof­fee while your book prints.

    But what else? Maybe a really good book­store becomes known as THE venue for smart lec­tures & pre­sen­ta­tions. (And NOT just book readings/signings, which hold the title of Lamest of All Live Events.) They’re uniquely poised to do events b/c the psy­cho­graphic is right: smart, curi­ous peo­ple who want to sit in a room with other smart, curi­ous people.

    And what else?

    Tim Carmody says:

    Jon Hansen broached this in a com­ment thread a month ago.

    To repeat my main point from that post: one of the excit­ing things about the Nook is that it envi­sions a future for the book­store where e-book and brick-and-mortar work sympathetically. 

    But you’re right — B&N needs to use/adapt its exist­ing stores. Some kind of new cyber­book­store could rein­vent this entirely. 

    OR: some kind of new, high-end anti-digital book­sellers, with lots of wood pan­el­ing, art books, expen­sive sta­tionery, per­son­al­ized leather cov­ers. The return of the book­plate! Maybe you’re a mem­ber, and you go there to read and smoke a pipe. You don’t wait on line for cof­fee — some­one brings cof­fee to you. Or a basil gimlet.

    Tim Maly says:

    Or it’s an Apple Store chic-clean-environment but specif­i­cally designed for com­fort­able read­ing. Lots of couches and chairs. And, of course, note­books and book plates and cards and so on. The “you can read any book so long as you are in a store” thing in the Nook is genius. Pure mar­ket­ing genius. It’s such a canny move and it never occurred to me as a pos­si­bil­ity. My favourite kind of idea.

    Also, it should host Tram­po­line Hall-type events (you guys would love Tram­po­line Hall, a monthly series of curated lec­tures where peo­ple speak about things that they are not experts-in). And maybe there are some com­put­ers around too. But def­i­nitely the main area is full of chairs and tables that are eas­ily recon­fig­ured. And read­ing here is free but there is a cof­fee shop and POD and dig­i­tal down­loads if you want to read the rest later (of course you do).

    Tim Maly says:

    I’ve been toss­ing around an idea for a kind of joke prod­uct in my head. It’s a eReader book plate. Or even bet­ter, an eReader replace­able cover. So you can proudly dis­play what you are read­ing (or lie about it).

    Or bumper­stick­ers. “My other Kin­dle has Proust” whatever.

    Have I talked about the This is Not a Read­ing Series series here? It’s book events except that it’s not read­ings. It’s panel dis­cus­sions or debates or per­for­mances all related to the books but inter­est­ing as sep­a­rate events in their own right. Indeed, the book store they were attached to has shut down, but the event lives on.

    […] lec­ture appear­ances, less-popular non­fic­tion writ­ers sell human­i­ties sem­i­nars, Ben Franklin sold book­plates, and mag­a­zines sell sub­scriber data. It all makes the movie industry’s reliance on box […]

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply