Popes, panels and Paper Machines

So I went to this ter­rific con­fer­ence last week called the Forum d’Avignon. High­lights included see­ing comic-book auteur Mar­jane Satrapi, hang­ing out with the AFP’s Eric Scherer, talk­ing Dude The­ory with Umair Haque (pre­vi­ous love here, here), and see­ing Larry Lessig give one of his amaz­ing, media-saturated pre­sen­ta­tions in this room…

…which is inside this building…

…which is, you know, where the pope once reigned.

Pretty nice spot for a conference.

Now, let me pause there and start another thread. They’re going to come back together in a moment.

Tim has rec­om­mended Jacques Derrida’s book Paper Machine many times before (here and here, for starters)—and he even hooked me up with a copy a few months ago. Since then, I’ve tried, sev­eral times, to dig into it—always with­out any luck.

But that’s a virtue of phys­i­cal books, isn’t it? They’re per­sis­tent. They hang around. They don’t dis­ap­pear for­ever when you close the tab. So as I was pack­ing for the Forum d’Avignon, I saw Paper Machine sit­ting there on my white table, and thought to myself, well, this seems appropriate.

Maybe sleep depri­va­tion is the secret. Maybe high alti­tude helps abstract think­ing. Maybe Air France puts phi­los­o­phy in their cof­fee. What­ever it was, my expe­ri­ence with Paper Machine was com­pletely trans­formed: I devoured it. Couldn’t get enough. My Carmody-provided copy is now man­gled and molested—page-corners turned back, sec­tions starred and underlined.

(And no sur­prise, Tim’s right: you ought to read this book.)

Here’s where it comes back together. In that grand con­clave room of the Palais des Papes in Avi­gnon, I mod­er­ated a panel of my own…

… a panel that fea­tured, among oth­ers, the direc­tor of an inno­v­a­tive school in Den­mark; the direc­tor of the second-largest pub­lisher in France; and the chair­man of Vivendi. And mid­way through this panel, to make a point, I used… yes… Paper Machine:

I just want to rein­force that there were some seri­ous dudes in the audi­ence here—the chair­man of Vivendi on my left, and var­i­ous min­is­ters and CEOs arrayed before us. And that’s cool! The stuff we talk about here reaches out into the real world. Some­times we get to be emis­saries for this long-running con­ver­sa­tion, and bring it before the bish­ops and car­di­nals of the media magisterium.

So that’s my Paper Machine story.

With one adden­dum: back dur­ing the flight, I was flip­ping through the book, look­ing for a note I’d made. I sim­ply could not find it. I finally found the spot in the text that I’d been think­ing of—but no note. The page was pris­tine. I was sure I’d made a big squig­gly mark there; I remem­bered doing it, with a flour­ish; we were 30,000 feet above the Atlantic and I thought I was going insane.

But in fact, my copy of Paper Machine is defec­tive. The first 32 pages repeat—so at page 33, I have another title page, and then the whole thing just loops, all the way until page 64, at which point it con­tin­ues as if noth­ing hap­pened. So aha: I had marked one copy of that spot, but was now look­ing at another.

Two things. First: isn’t that just totally, absolutely per­fect? I can­not tell you how delighted I am that my copy of Jacques Derrida’s Paper Machine is messed up in a way that only a phys­i­cal book could be messed up. And sec­ond: I still have 32 pages to read, somehow.

9 Responses

    Len says:

    dude you look like Lex Luthor now. That over­lord video screen looks like the Apple commercial.

    Robin Sloan says:

    1. The light­ing is rather scary & skull­tac­u­lar, isn’t it?
    2. I’m pretty sure there were some actual supervil­lains in the audience.

    Saheli says:

    I actu­ally think the sec­ond pic­ture is more creepier than the first–more dem­a­gogue on the march. In the first you look more like a large tapes­try of a help­ful young priest.

    Len says:

    And, this event looks com­pletely cool and I am very jeal­ous. Now the tables have turned: you are the mod­er­a­tor now.

    Also, the Pope in Avi­gnon wasn’t the REAL Pope.

    Tim Carmody says:

    If I remem­ber right, I bought you three books: Paper Machine, Wal­ter Benjamin’s The Work of Art in the Age of Its Tech­no­log­i­cal Repro­ducibil­ity, and Other Writ­ings on Media, and Alan Liu’s The Laws of Cool. And you said, “Cool! I’m going to start with the skinny one!” — which was Paper Machine, def­i­nitely the least acces­si­ble of the three books. ;-)

    Still, totally delighted that you’ve 1) read the book 2) like the book and espe­cially 3) made use of the book! And the irreg­u­lar sig­na­tures in the book, man, that’s just gravy. There’s a whole Der­ridean read­ing of “the fold” to be made there, which I will mer­ci­fully leave alone. :-)

    But that’s a virtue of phys­i­cal books, isn’t it? They’re per­sis­tent. They hang around. They don’t dis­ap­pear for­ever when you close the tab.”

    ℑ ❦ you for this phrase, sim­ply beau­ti­ful (though tabs also stop dis­ap­pear­ing once you use insta’paper’ or other ‘book’marking tools).

    What did the direc­tor of KaosPi­lots say? I’m inter­ested in “rethink­ing edu­ca­tion in a web2.0 world” and am cur­rently look­ing at http://knowmads.nl/ — an action-learning kind of busi­ness school. I’m sure you’d a few thoughts on this subject.

    Saheli says:

    Also, if you think that that kind of screw up is only pos­si­bly with paper books, you clearly have not graded enough papers and lab reports turned in via email. :-)

    Bethany says:

    I think it says some­thing about Derrida’s writ­ing that you could read the first 32 pages twice and not notice. I think it says that there is so much in it you found new things the sec­ond time.

    […] world of paper is sub­sumed in new machines for vir­tu­al­iza­tion.” I dis­cov­ered this one thanks to Robin Sloan, who has been mak­ing some encour­ag­ing waves with his self-published […]

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply