Time, space, and warehouse robots

Alexis Madri­gal has a great piece about ware­house robots over at Wired Sci­ence. Here’s a nuance I would not have predicted:

The sys­tem adjusts to the nature of the prod­ucts and work­ers, too. In a typ­i­cal [robot ware­house], the humans are placed around the edges of the room. As the robots pick up loads of prod­ucts and put them back, they adjust the ware­house for greater effi­ciency. More pop­u­lar prod­ucts end up around the edges of the ware­house while more obscure prod­ucts, like those acid-washed bell bot­toms, end up buried deep in the stacks. The self-tuning nature of the sys­tem cre­ates big efficiencies.

How cool is that? The ware­house adapts. The phys­i­cal space becomes a map of the under­ly­ing cost of time—which isn’t just about raw dis­tance in this case, but about rep­e­ti­tion, too.

I real­ize this sort of map­ping exists else­where; I just can’t think of any­where else where it’s so flex­i­ble. For instance, I’m think­ing about this view of Lon­don that paints both hous­ing cost (in dol­lars) and travel cost (in min­utes) onto the map. Now if only bits of the city could scoot around on robot wheels and rearrange them­selves for max­i­mum efficiency…

See also: Matt Jones’ recent talk on time as a mate­r­ial that can be manip­u­lated and designed.

One Response

    CC says:

    Reminds me of Michael Pollan’s advice to shop the edges of gro­cery stores because that’s where the real food is — the actual, ancestor-recognizable, per­ish­able foods. i didn’t quite con­nect the dots until now that this is because perime­ter place­ment is the opti­mal bot-tested solu­tion for high turnover items. 

    Always fun when the real world sur­prises you with design solu­tions. Remem­ber that bizarre-shaped antenna “evolved” using genetic algo­rithms? scroll to bot­tom for pic: http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/projects/esg/research/antenna.htm

The Snarkmatrix awaits your reply