The murmur of the snarkmatrix…

August § The Common Test / 2016-02-16 21:04:46
Robin § Unforgotten / 2016-01-08 21:19:16
MsFitNZ § Towards A Theory of Secondary Literacy / 2015-11-03 21:23:21
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 18:39:56
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 16:32:50
Matt § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-05 01:49:12
Greg Linch § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 18:05:52
Robin § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 05:11:02
P. Renaud § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 04:13:09
Jay H § Matching cuts / 2014-10-02 02:41:13

Error-Code Poetry
 / 

I just subscribed to Jamais Cascio’s future-y blog on Fast Company and in the subhed of the Google Reader subscribe page, it said:

The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.

That’s just a bit of exposed CMS-speak, but hmm. It seems resonant somehow.

Hari Seldon, speaking to students across a glowing touch-table covered with flickering blue-green graphs: “But to predict future events, you must apply the taxonomy view.” He swipes his thumb and the graphs rotate.

A student pipes up. Linus, the eager one: “But at what depth, Master Seldon? Three-hundred? Three-thousand?”

“No, no, no.” Seldon smiles. “The depth… is zero.”

August 24, 2009 / Uncategorized

One comment

I like this imagined vignette so much.

Roland Barthes wrote a book called Writing Degree Zero. The degree zero of writing for Barthes is a style that’s almost an anti-style, like Camus’s The Stranger — flattened-out prose that achieves its own peculiar resonance, because it’s so ordinary.

The snarkmatrix awaits you

Below, you can use basic HTML tags and/or Markdown syntax.