The murmur of the snarkmatrix…

August § The Common Test / 2016-02-16 21:04:46
Robin § Unforgotten / 2016-01-08 21:19:16
MsFitNZ § Towards A Theory of Secondary Literacy / 2015-11-03 21:23:21
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 18:39:56
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 16:32:50
Matt § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-05 01:49:12
Greg Linch § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 18:05:52
Robin § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 05:11:02
P. Renaud § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 04:13:09
Jay H § Matching cuts / 2014-10-02 02:41:13

Responsibility to Protect
 / 

Good, short piece by David Rieff in the NYT about the urge to intervene — and the fact that we never actually do.

Any other good references/readings on this out there?

Update: Good pointers from David in the comments. Also, “criminal neglect.”

May 31, 2008 / Uncategorized

3 comments

I’m not sure what sort of readings you’re looking for. As you say, Rieff’s piece is pretty good.

The two things that really caught my eye while the whole “we should invade Burma” this was swirling were this excellent comprehensive post by John Boonstra at UN Dispatch about all the often misinformed prognostication about the “responsibility to protect” (R2P) doctrine and this sagacious but brief paragraph from Matt Yglesias:

The thing you have to understand about the surge of pundits wanting to invade Burma is that it

That’s *exactly* the kind of stuff I was looking for, David. Thanks for the thoughtful pointers.

This is just a disjointed thought, but I wonder if it’s easier to generate both a sense of responsibility to intervene in a crisis and actual, concrete momentum to do so exactly when there’s already a fairly long-standing non-crisis sense of responsibility to begin with. Hence the Berlin Airlift, the Marshall Plan, etc.

These also advanced strategic political and material interests, to be sure, but I think it was easier to envision “saving” Europe once the U.S. felt that it had done so once already (and bore some responsibility for its destruction too). Likewise, the late-1990s intervention in the Balkans, which followed the mid-1990s activity there.

Burma’s a strange case, because a chunk of the public already feels drawn to the country and a sense of antipathy towards the political/military leadership because of the earlier political rumblings, which the natural disaster only builds upon. But nobody’s actually been involved there, been really responsible; so there’s no real momentum to build on to act in a crisis.

The snarkmatrix awaits you

Below, you can use basic HTML tags and/or Markdown syntax.