<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Stakeholders, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891</link>
	<description>The stomping grounds of Tim Carmody, Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson. It&#039;s a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, culture, design, books, music, movies, the future and the past.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/comment-page-1#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.207.132.117/?p=1891#comment-3145</guid>
		<description>Yeah. That 2001 tax rebate, though? That was sound fiscal policy, for sure.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. That 2001 tax rebate, though? That was sound fiscal policy, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/comment-page-1#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.207.132.117/?p=1891#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>As much as I like this idea, I always forget how it will play in political reality. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/?p=273&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yesterday&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; from the Strib&#039;s conserva-blogger was a reminder. A sample: &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/?p=273&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hillary Clinton as Santa Claus&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;: Hillary Clinton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I like this idea, I always forget how it will play in political reality. <a href="http://www.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/?p=273" rel="nofollow">Yesterday’s post</a> from the Strib’s conserva-blogger was a reminder. A sample:<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/?p=273" rel="nofollow"><strong>Hillary Clinton as Santa Claus</strong></a>: Hillary Clinton</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gd</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/comment-page-1#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>gd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.207.132.117/?p=1891#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>Another data point for the New American Foundation Manchurian Candidate theory:  Hillary&#039;s health care proposal is very similar to the idea that NAF has been circulating for the last few years.  Who was one of the main spokesthinkers for NAF&#039;s plan?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/insurance_required&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Laurie Rubiner&lt;/a&gt;.  And who is now a top aide to Hillary?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:KIf0pX5xFcAJ:www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi%3D20060220%26s%3Dlizza022006+Laurie+Rubiner&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Laurie&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legistorm.com/person/Laurie_Rubiner/2916.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rubiner&lt;/a&gt;.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another data point for the New American Foundation Manchurian Candidate theory:  Hillary’s health care proposal is very similar to the idea that NAF has been circulating for the last few years.  Who was one of the main spokesthinkers for NAF’s plan?  <a href="http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/insurance_required" rel="nofollow">Laurie Rubiner</a>.  And who is now a top aide to Hillary?  <a href="http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:KIf0pX5xFcAJ:www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi%3D20060220%26s%3Dlizza022006+Laurie+Rubiner&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;cd=1&#038;gl=us&#038;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">Laurie</a> <a href="http://www.legistorm.com/person/Laurie_Rubiner/2916.html" rel="nofollow">Rubiner</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/comment-page-1#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.207.132.117/?p=1891#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>Heh.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://snarkmarket.com/2007/1891/comment-page-1#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.207.132.117/?p=1891#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>This is a fantastic idea. Whoever passes this legislation should make it retroactive - to, say, 2007. Or at least, September 2007. It&#039;s only fair.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fantastic idea. Whoever passes this legislation should make it retroactive — to, say, 2007. Or at least, September 2007. It’s only fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
