The murmur of the snarkmatrix…

August § The Common Test / 2016-02-16 21:04:46
Robin § Unforgotten / 2016-01-08 21:19:16
MsFitNZ § Towards A Theory of Secondary Literacy / 2015-11-03 21:23:21
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 18:39:56
Jon Schultz § Bless the toolmakers / 2015-05-04 16:32:50
Matt § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-05 01:49:12
Greg Linch § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 18:05:52
Robin § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 05:11:02
P. Renaud § A leaky rocketship / 2014-11-04 04:13:09
Bob Stepno § The structure of journalism today / 2014-03-10 18:42:32

Best Movie Critics

From Ask MeFi, which movie critics do you trust?

My answer: I use the incomparable MetaCritic to figure out which films to see. Aggregated critical opinion really is a wondrous thing. (And MetaCritic, as one astute AMeFi commenter puts it, “is what Rotten Tomatoes wants to be when it grows up.”)

So critics have a different function for me. My favorite critics give me smart, unexpected analyses that make the moviegoing experience richer. Often I read their reviews only after I’ve seen a film, to see what they saw in it that I didn’t. For this purpose, my favorites are the NYT‘s Manohla Dargis, Salon‘s Stephanie Zacharek (especially for commercial movies), and James Berardinelli. And my second-tier critics are The New Yorker‘s Anthony Lane, Slate‘s David Edelstein, and Ebert.


I think that I have your first and second tier reversed (plus, I’d replace Dargas with A.O. Scott). Dargas is too loud for me at times.

I used to stick up for Rotten Tomatoes, but then it totally got too ugly and banner-y. I’m on the MetaCritic bandwagon now.

One of the things I notice about MC, though, is that its reviews are always weighted towards the middle — more 80s than 90s, more 20s than teens. If there’s one thing I still like about RT, it’s the fact that Ultraviolet can get 8 percent. Ultra-meta-slam!

The snarkmatrix awaits you

Below, you can use basic HTML tags and/or Markdown syntax.