Can I just say how underwhelmed I am by the NYT’s choice of Fareed Zakaria to review Tom Friedman’s new book? I mean… isn’t Fareed Zakaria basically just Tom Friedman? Boooring.
I Know We’ve Discussed This Already, But
Can I just say how underwhelmed I am by
What is this — an existential statement, some kind of zen koan, or an HTML pun? Is it a comment on the font of your signature? Or is there something I’m missing?
My RSS Live Bookmark takes me to the permasnark link of each post. I just read the full Zakaria/Freedman snark on the splash page: must be some kind of coding glitch that produced the extraordinarily profund statement of self-effacement I quote above. It’s what we artsy types call “a happy accident.”
And finally, a comment on the snark itself.
If there’s a discernible and valuable difference between Fareed Zakaria and Tom Friedman, it’s in the following.
1) Fareed Zakaria is funnier and has a better sense of humor than Tom Friedman.
2) Probably as a result of 1, Zakaria tells fewer jokes.
I fixed the zen koan.
Below, you can use basic HTML tags and/or Markdown syntax.
Composing a reply. Cancel?
Founded in 2003, Snarkmarket is a long-running conversation about media, journalism, technology, cities, design, books, music, movies, the future, and the past.
The title, it should be said, is a misnomer. You’ll see.
Follow along: @Snarkmarket on Twitter / Snarkmarket RSS
A leaky rocketship
/ Bless the toolmakers
/ The art of working in public
/ The cave, the corps, the league
/ The two mayors
/ Age of majority
/ A hypothetical path to the speakularity
/ Kanye west, media cyborg
/ Only crash
/ Stock and flow
All-time best comment threads:
Explosions in the sky
The deep snarkives: 2017 (1)